From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4097 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2004 20:19:14 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Nov 2004 20:19:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1COie2-0007he-On for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 20:19:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 27578 invoked by uid 89); 1 Nov 2004 20:18:23 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19562 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2004 20:18:23 +0000 Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:17:01 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: Roman Gaufman Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20041101201701.33080341@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <921ad39e04110110143a418d68@mail.gmail.com> References: <20041030145454.92C1524ABB@orm.localnet> <1099214725.17978.20.camel@sponge.fungus> <921ad39e04103103187bf99f0c@mail.gmail.com> <20041031133603.56b2addd@snowdrop.home> <921ad39e04110110143a418d68@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__1_Nov_2004_20_17_01_+0000_wUG4CqPSRZVq93.k" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords X-Archives-Salt: 0eecd5ab-e687-4311-a178-15df1e6800ab X-Archives-Hash: 17c0dfd699754ab2e2ae216837b7e4c9 --Signature=_Mon__1_Nov_2004_20_17_01_+0000_wUG4CqPSRZVq93.k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:14:30 +0000 Roman Gaufman wrote: | On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:36:03 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh | wrote: | > On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:18:33 +0000 Roman Gaufman | > wrote: | > | Would make a very nice QA measure. Any outdated/broken ebuild | > | could be auto reported to bugzilla and removed in 72 hours if no | > | responce. | > | > Eh? Huh? By "QA measure" you mean "ways of making loads of QA | > problems"? | | You know better, but why would this cause QA problems? -- if | maintainer disappeared and the package just sits there for years, | hell, let it be removed. Otherwise, a maintainer can just reply to bug | report and not be asked about it again. If we were to remove 'unmaintained' packages, you wouldn't be able to bootstrap. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Mon__1_Nov_2004_20_17_01_+0000_wUG4CqPSRZVq93.k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBhpm/96zL6DUtXhERAgK3AJkBaO9TBxPYd7KJYC/OawmbgfueLQCfU7Q0 7biRi9UnqJ0UdNyVrhiJo6c= =Ukrm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__1_Nov_2004_20_17_01_+0000_wUG4CqPSRZVq93.k--