From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-17075-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 4097 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2004 20:19:14 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197)
  by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Nov 2004 20:19:14 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
	id 1COie2-0007he-On
	for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 20:19:14 +0000
Received: (qmail 27578 invoked by uid 89); 1 Nov 2004 20:18:23 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 19562 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2004 20:18:23 +0000
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:17:01 +0000
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: Roman Gaufman <hackeron@gmail.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Message-ID: <20041101201701.33080341@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <921ad39e04110110143a418d68@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20041030145454.92C1524ABB@orm.localnet>
	<1099214725.17978.20.camel@sponge.fungus>
	<921ad39e04103103187bf99f0c@mail.gmail.com>
	<20041031133603.56b2addd@snowdrop.home>
	<921ad39e04110110143a418d68@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="pgp-sha1";
 boundary="Signature=_Mon__1_Nov_2004_20_17_01_+0000_wUG4CqPSRZVq93.k"
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords
X-Archives-Salt: 0eecd5ab-e687-4311-a178-15df1e6800ab
X-Archives-Hash: 17c0dfd699754ab2e2ae216837b7e4c9

--Signature=_Mon__1_Nov_2004_20_17_01_+0000_wUG4CqPSRZVq93.k
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:14:30 +0000 Roman Gaufman <hackeron@gmail.com>
wrote:
| On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:36:03 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh
| <ciaranm@gentoo.org> wrote:
| > On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:18:33 +0000 Roman Gaufman
| > <hackeron@gmail.com> wrote:
| > | Would make a very nice QA measure. Any outdated/broken ebuild
| > | could be auto reported to bugzilla and removed in 72 hours if no
| > | responce.
| > 
| > Eh? Huh? By "QA measure" you mean "ways of making loads of QA
| > problems"?
| 
| You know better, but why would this cause QA problems? -- if
| maintainer disappeared and the package just sits there for years,
| hell, let it be removed. Otherwise, a maintainer can just reply to bug
| report and not be asked about it again.

If we were to remove 'unmaintained' packages, you wouldn't be able to
bootstrap.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


--Signature=_Mon__1_Nov_2004_20_17_01_+0000_wUG4CqPSRZVq93.k
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBhpm/96zL6DUtXhERAgK3AJkBaO9TBxPYd7KJYC/OawmbgfueLQCfU7Q0
7biRi9UnqJ0UdNyVrhiJo6c=
=Ukrm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Mon__1_Nov_2004_20_17_01_+0000_wUG4CqPSRZVq93.k--