From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-17048-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 19980 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2004 13:37:20 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 31 Oct 2004 13:37:20 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1COFtY-0003XX-Ec for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:37:20 +0000 Received: (qmail 11091 invoked by uid 89); 31 Oct 2004 13:37:20 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 23195 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2004 13:37:19 +0000 Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:36:03 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20041031133603.56b2addd@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <921ad39e04103103187bf99f0c@mail.gmail.com> References: <20041030145454.92C1524ABB@orm.localnet> <1099214725.17978.20.camel@sponge.fungus> <921ad39e04103103187bf99f0c@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__31_Oct_2004_13_36_03_+0000_Kv9oVpjCSo/AqDQT" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords X-Archives-Salt: 4adc2454-d337-43bd-a3bf-716b3b7a2b4e X-Archives-Hash: 3d53b483c6b7a724a787a37c3e5626ae --Signature=_Sun__31_Oct_2004_13_36_03_+0000_Kv9oVpjCSo/AqDQT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:18:33 +0000 Roman Gaufman <hackeron@gmail.com> wrote: | Would make a very nice QA measure. Any outdated/broken ebuild could be | auto reported to bugzilla and removed in 72 hours if no responce. Eh? Huh? By "QA measure" you mean "ways of making loads of QA problems"? | I think gentoo really needs QA measures of this sort. Like in debian, | packages get moved up from unstable to testing automatically if no | critical reports were made for 2 weeks. We've already discussed over and over why we can't do this. It would be a QA nightmare. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Sun__31_Oct_2004_13_36_03_+0000_Kv9oVpjCSo/AqDQT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBhOpJ96zL6DUtXhERAkPlAJ9Zpc9Z4KtDjDOil5+HQwOxPpgpbQCgwds4 i9H1fwZ3Awjk/npjU7TKudQ= =XV/n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__31_Oct_2004_13_36_03_+0000_Kv9oVpjCSo/AqDQT--