From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28634 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2004 04:06:41 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 Oct 2004 04:06:41 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CNkVl-0004Ni-1K for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 04:06:41 +0000 Received: (qmail 13579 invoked by uid 89); 30 Oct 2004 04:06:40 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 16390 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2004 04:06:40 +0000 Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:51:29 -0400 X-OfflineIMAP-623475957-70696d656e7473656e64-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1099108501-0145662996418-v4.0.6 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20041030035129.GA16026@mustard.flatmonk.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1096147090.3450.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <1096147090.3450.8.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cvs-1.12.9 needs kerberos and pam testing X-Archives-Salt: 697493fd-6daf-40e9-b45e-a7aa6123c13b X-Archives-Hash: 3834dc79f301a7c0ee7ca02ad033e556 Rainer Groesslinger wrote: [Sat Sep 25 2004, 05:18:10PM EDT] > until a few minutes ago, we only had cvs-1.11.x ("stable branch") in our > tree, I just committed the latest feature release 1.12.9. > The release itself should not give anyone problems, but the ebuild adds > a bunch of new features that I didn't want to introduce in 1.11 anymore. >=20 > I put it into package.mask, but intend to remove it from there in a few > days, I just want to be sure there is nothing wrong with the > kerberos/pam stuff. This works well on ia64. I suspect it can be removed from package.mask at this point. Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list