[gentoo-dev] cvs-1.12.9 needs kerberos and pam testing

[gentoo-dev] cvs-1.12.9 needs kerberos and pam testing

[Rainer Groesslinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 627 bytes --]

Hi guys,

until a few minutes ago, we only had cvs-1.11.x ("stable branch") in our
tree, I just committed the latest feature release 1.12.9.
The release itself should not give anyone problems, but the ebuild adds
a bunch of new features that I didn't want to introduce in 1.11 anymore.

I put it into package.mask, but intend to remove it from there in a few
days, I just want to be sure there is nothing wrong with the
kerberos/pam stuff.

So, please test and report all problems you have with the ebuild on
bugzilla and assign them to me (and if appropriate CC some encryption
people :)

Cheers,
-- 
Rainer

[-- Attachment #2: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] cvs-1.12.9 needs kerberos and pam testing

[Aron Griffis]

Rainer Groesslinger wrote:	[Sat Sep 25 2004, 05:18:10PM EDT]
> until a few minutes ago, we only had cvs-1.11.x ("stable branch") in our
> tree, I just committed the latest feature release 1.12.9.
> The release itself should not give anyone problems, but the ebuild adds
> a bunch of new features that I didn't want to introduce in 1.11 anymore.
> 
> I put it into package.mask, but intend to remove it from there in a few
> days, I just want to be sure there is nothing wrong with the
> kerberos/pam stuff.

This works well on ia64.  I suspect it can be removed from
package.mask at this point.

Regards,
Aron

--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] cvs-1.12.9 needs kerberos and pam testing

[Aaron Walker]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Aron Griffis wrote:
| Rainer Groesslinger wrote:	[Sat Sep 25 2004, 05:18:10PM EDT]
|
|>until a few minutes ago, we only had cvs-1.11.x ("stable branch") in our
|>tree, I just committed the latest feature release 1.12.9.
|>The release itself should not give anyone problems, but the ebuild adds
|>a bunch of new features that I didn't want to introduce in 1.11 anymore.
|>
|>I put it into package.mask, but intend to remove it from there in a few
|>days, I just want to be sure there is nothing wrong with the
|>kerberos/pam stuff.
|
|
| This works well on ia64.  I suspect it can be removed from
| package.mask at this point.

Agreed.  I've been using it on all my boxen (x86) since the original post and
haven't had a single problem thus far.

Cheers
- --
Put your Nose to the Grindstone!
		-- Amalgamated Plastic Surgeons and Toolmakers, Ltd.

Aaron Walker < ka0ttic@gentoo.org >	http://dev.gentoo.org/~ka0ttic/
Gentoo/BSD | cron | shell-tools		http://butsugenjitemple.org/~ka0ttic/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBg16QC3poscuANHARAsedAKDlUb5YWeaYpOxB3j+qeYU8wINe3wCePXL3
DcHbFE+VjFpK58a2rwJPOVc=
=1YeV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list