[gentoo-dev] ooo 1.1.2

[gentoo-dev] ooo 1.1.2

[Norberto Bensa]

Hello,

1.1.2 vanished from portage. 

I won't upgrade to 1.1.3 since it dislikes gcc 3.4.2.

Masking ooo-1.1.3 gives me a downgrade to 1.1.1. So who and why did delete 
ooo-1.1.2? And why not 1.1.1, 1.1.0, 1.0.3?

Thanks,
Norberto

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] ooo 1.1.2

[Thierry Carrez]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 443 bytes --]

Norberto Bensa wrote:

> 1.1.2 vanished from portage. 
> 
> I won't upgrade to 1.1.3 since it dislikes gcc 3.4.2.
> 
> Masking ooo-1.1.3 gives me a downgrade to 1.1.1. So who and why did delete 
> ooo-1.1.2? And why not 1.1.1, 1.1.0, 1.0.3?

OO.org 1.1.2 has been removed by its maintainer for security reasons.
It's the only version affected by bug 63556.

It could have been only masked.

-- 
Koon
Operational Manager, Gentoo Linux Security

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] ooo 1.1.2

[Paul de Vrieze]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 561 bytes --]

On Tuesday 19 October 2004 18:30, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 1.1.2 vanished from portage.
>
> I won't upgrade to 1.1.3 since it dislikes gcc 3.4.2.
>
> Masking ooo-1.1.3 gives me a downgrade to 1.1.1. So who and why did delete
> ooo-1.1.2? And why not 1.1.1, 1.1.0, 1.0.3?

Well, 1.1.2 won't like gcc-3.4.2 either. When I get time for it I'll try to 
come up with a hack to depend on a gcc-3.3 version and use that 
automatically.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]