From: Dylan Carlson <absinthe@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patch filename conventions (WAS: Proposal: patches.gentoo.org)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 02:01:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410150201.59776.absinthe@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1097817207.31274.5.camel@localhost>
On Fri October 15 2004 01:13, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> The only way what you're talking about makes any sense to me is if a
> tarball isn't used, just a bzip2'd patch.
Sure, I see your point. Going by what's in the tree right now: ~5700
plain ASCII patch files, ~200 binary/compressed (mainly bz2), and only a
few tarballs. All would need to be binary for this switch, anyway.
There's some transition work for maintainers to make patchsets. Because
some patch files are used between multiple versions, etc. Using patchsets
is more of a hassle IMO, but as long as it's a standard practice, I'm fine
with it...
Cheers,
Dylan Carlson [absinthe@gentoo.org]
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-15 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-12 19:09 [gentoo-dev] Proposal: patches.gentoo.org Chris Gianelloni
2004-10-12 19:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-10-12 19:32 ` George Shapovalov
2004-10-12 19:33 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-10-13 12:53 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-10-13 13:28 ` Doug Goldstein
2004-10-12 19:27 ` Marius Mauch
2004-10-12 19:52 ` Beber
2004-10-12 20:11 ` Marius Mauch
2004-10-12 20:10 ` Nicholas Jones
2004-10-12 20:50 ` Jeffrey Forman
2004-10-12 20:57 ` Jeffrey Forman
2004-10-12 23:20 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-10-13 12:43 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-10-13 9:46 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-10-13 12:19 ` Lance Albertson
2004-10-13 12:39 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-10-12 19:57 ` Nick Dimiduk
2004-10-12 19:57 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-10-12 20:17 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-10-12 22:04 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-10-13 13:05 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-10-13 15:16 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-10-14 12:07 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-10-15 15:13 ` Xavier Neys
2004-10-14 20:38 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-10-14 21:05 ` Mark Loeser
2004-10-15 1:00 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-10-14 22:08 ` [gentoo-dev] Patch filename conventions (WAS: Proposal: patches.gentoo.org) Dylan Carlson
2004-10-14 22:14 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-10-15 2:20 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-10-15 2:58 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-10-15 4:24 ` Dylan Carlson
2004-10-15 5:13 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-10-15 6:01 ` Dylan Carlson [this message]
2004-10-15 6:04 ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-10-15 12:16 ` Kurt Lieber
2004-10-15 0:49 ` [gentoo-dev] Proposal: patches.gentoo.org Chris Gianelloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410150201.59776.absinthe@gentoo.org \
--to=absinthe@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox