From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15294 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2004 22:14:38 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Oct 2004 22:14:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CIDrp-0004nb-Hl for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:14:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 30133 invoked by uid 89); 14 Oct 2004 22:14:36 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 11991 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2004 22:14:36 +0000 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:14:30 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <1097608185.20261.8.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <200410141638.22597.absinthe@gentoo.org> <200410141808.05200.absinthe@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200410141808.05200.absinthe@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410141814.30358.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patch filename conventions (WAS: Proposal: patches.gentoo.org) X-Archives-Salt: 7b940cf7-79cc-47c1-849d-c772d75d2669 X-Archives-Hash: 2dfbe18150723ddf30ed8eacfad1d8b4 On Thursday 14 October 2004 06:08 pm, Dylan Carlson wrote: > I know it's bad form to reply to your own message, but I'm doing it anyway. > Here's my quick stab on filename convention: if a covention is going to be developed it's going to involve what epatch already uses: ##_${ARCH}_foo.patch if you want to flesh out the 'foo' part, fine, but the prefix involving a # and $ARCH is already set in stone -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list