From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11931 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2004 13:05:32 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Oct 2004 13:05:32 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CHiot-0007Da-2r for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:05:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 3255 invoked by uid 89); 13 Oct 2004 13:05:30 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 10593 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2004 13:05:30 +0000 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:05:27 +0000 From: Kurt Lieber To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20041013130527.GI26288@mail.lieber.org> References: <1097608185.20261.8.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oggc+OFmk9epKmFn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1097608185.20261.8.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> X-GPG-Key: http://www.lieber.org/kurtl.pub.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: patches.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: eccb3da6-ffa3-423d-a551-4681b68f286e X-Archives-Hash: b1b6237cf58981f71607d14580c347e3 --oggc+OFmk9epKmFn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 03:09:45PM -0400 or thereabouts, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > We were talking about this on IRC due to the growing concern over > patches and other files in ${FILESDIR} in the portage tree. This is > basically the idea that we came up with to resolve the problem. After reading the other thread, sounds like this problem may not be as large as we thought it was. If we're talking about a ~5% space savings in portage itself, I'm not sure it's worth the extra effort of setting up yet another mirroring system. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but please use facts to do it. I'm willing to set up this mirroring system, but only if it solves a real problem. --kurt --oggc+OFmk9epKmFn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBbSgXJPpRNiftIEYRAh7uAKCOdqgJuKrRg3Ru7lQS+YiD02yHNgCgjnoi jY4eJ6XUpFZspElv3gbi2ZQ= =GfD8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oggc+OFmk9epKmFn--