From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8619 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2004 20:11:35 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Oct 2004 20:11:35 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CHSzc-00086R-Qk for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:11:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 31227 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2004 20:11:32 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 25554 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2004 20:11:31 +0000 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:11:21 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20041012221121.62956a26@andy.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <416C35F8.9030402@setibzh.com> References: <1097608185.20261.8.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20041012212759.459bb1fe@andy.genone.homeip.net> <416C35F8.9030402@setibzh.com> Organization: Gentoo Linux X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: H@&[wkk?l:Zx:8i_5bViK&{Vz{c{~r),^&:v/r#+X5dmfA6qCl)~'Ul{"&06Q1[05.%v&c>je5R{=xLnx^=~lN~rO0xuR~~NY)CX\"Nc4$9CBPwDl-.pYuVeGdir86L@\:j?7@%Ej2?Wi-Y0=1]T14ce0w79Bckk[*ti{;iA"{;I}&E~.msRBsBS)N!CS4Gd|_UR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__12_Oct_2004_22_11_21_+0200_jraVaU2gWXf9R+x2" X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:7e6c91d1b14dbccceb2f2166522fa0f6 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: patches.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: ac397255-dd1c-438e-bb99-3b6192922a73 X-Archives-Hash: 0c6c7afb28d70335d512fa46bdb5a6ca --Signature=_Tue__12_Oct_2004_22_11_21_+0200_jraVaU2gWXf9R+x2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/12/04 Beber wrote: > Marius Mauch wrote: > > >>dev.gentoo.org:/space/distfiles-local > >> > >> > > 3. developer uploads patch to dev.gentoo.org:/space/patches-local > > and > > > > > >I don't see a reason to separate patches from distfiles. > > > > > I think my english is bad, tell if you don't understand what I want to > > say :/ > > I think that it's not to separate patch from distfiles (a lot are > already avaible) but to have a emerge sync faster and less bandwith > consumer. > many many patch are on sync server, many are not apply due to proc > architecture or USE flag. > Thoses patch that are on distfiles server aren't necessary download > like on sync > I think that it can be a way to take for futur. > > Like an other thing (for bandwith use) : if an update of a pacquet is > avaible : why download are the new sources instead of just a patch ? You're talking about something completely different, I'm just talking about the location on dev.gentoo.org, that has nothing to do wether a patch or a full tarball is used. Marius --Signature=_Tue__12_Oct_2004_22_11_21_+0200_jraVaU2gWXf9R+x2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBbDpuWzrL1pM7SNcRAgSmAJ4gcNXLQF3oLQEybMuzl7z8ASuOwQCfeWFy zkAovEhmhSzjXliP5BaY8Gg= =Rs8S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__12_Oct_2004_22_11_21_+0200_jraVaU2gWXf9R+x2--