From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-16382-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 22890 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2004 15:37:53 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Oct 2004 15:37:53 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CFwoa-00022O-OI for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2004 15:37:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 12776 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2004 15:37:52 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 3126 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2004 15:37:51 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:33:24 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20041008163324.024e1ee7@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <1097249235.26364.18.camel@localhost> References: <1097182787.6247.27.camel@helen.science.oregonstate.edu> <200410081247.09788.chrb@gentoo.org> <20041008140440.GA8667@cerberus.oppresses.us> <1097249235.26364.18.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__8_Oct_2004_16_33_24_+0100_MVf=MWafKp/fLIBb" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] non-Gentoo stuff in our CVS X-Archives-Salt: c2933fad-7a16-41eb-9dd6-25b2cf0ccc9b X-Archives-Hash: a7e3fb13fc572fd8cb0e8e8a704b67fb --Signature=_Fri__8_Oct_2004_16_33_24_+0100_MVf=MWafKp/fLIBb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 08:27:15 -0700 Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org> wrote: | Someone brought up the idea of arch yesterday. Maybe that's what I'll | have to do, even though it sucks because it raises the barrier to get | into X. It's tough enough to get recruits now. Making them learn two | separate and very different VCS's will only make it worse. If you want "easy to learn", svn and bitkeeper are both pretty similar to cvs operation-wise... arch is insanely nasty and does so many things differently. Plus it's full of hideous bugs :) -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Fri__8_Oct_2004_16_33_24_+0100_MVf=MWafKp/fLIBb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBZrNH96zL6DUtXhERAsmJAJ9BF984Sz+7DeXmXsSAkA1U09NlFgCfXyhj UTpEBJUqbmc3/p2duj6a+o0= =Po1B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__8_Oct_2004_16_33_24_+0100_MVf=MWafKp/fLIBb--