* [gentoo-dev] Binary files in $PORTDIR -- what are the official rules?
@ 2004-10-01 9:59 Georgi Georgiev
2004-10-01 10:41 ` Paul de Vrieze
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Georgi Georgiev @ 2004-10-01 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 852 bytes --]
When testing for http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56998 I found
out that a few of the patches that ghostscript uses were simply
compressed with bzip2 or gzip.
I remember a call from someone on the list, urging everyone to get rid
of files in files/ that are greater than 10K, and *not* to do it by
compressing the files. I am absolutely sure that those patches were plain
text at least when ghostscript-7.07.1-r3 was the most current version.
There was also an idea to not allow binary files in $PORTDIR at all. Is
there an official statement on the matter? I was off the list for almost
two months.
--
-* Georgi Georgiev -* Make headway at work. Continue to let -*
*- chutz@gg3.net *- things deteriorate at home. *-
-* +81(90)6266-1163 -* -*
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary files in $PORTDIR -- what are the official rules?
2004-10-01 9:59 [gentoo-dev] Binary files in $PORTDIR -- what are the official rules? Georgi Georgiev
@ 2004-10-01 10:41 ` Paul de Vrieze
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul de Vrieze @ 2004-10-01 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1053 bytes --]
On Friday 01 October 2004 11:59, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> When testing for http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56998 I found
> out that a few of the patches that ghostscript uses were simply
> compressed with bzip2 or gzip.
>
> I remember a call from someone on the list, urging everyone to get rid
> of files in files/ that are greater than 10K, and *not* to do it by
> compressing the files. I am absolutely sure that those patches were
> plain text at least when ghostscript-7.07.1-r3 was the most current
> version.
>
> There was also an idea to not allow binary files in $PORTDIR at all. Is
> there an official statement on the matter? I was off the list for
> almost two months.
Binary files should indeed be avoided in the tree. Those patches should be
provided in SRC_URI. The files dir is mainly for allmost trivial patches
that making available through the distfiles mirrors is more effort than
is waranted.
Paul
--
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-01 10:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-01 9:59 [gentoo-dev] Binary files in $PORTDIR -- what are the official rules? Georgi Georgiev
2004-10-01 10:41 ` Paul de Vrieze
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox