From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12490 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2004 23:58:13 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 23:58:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CDAoO-0006tz-JK for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:58:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 22141 invoked by uid 89); 30 Sep 2004 23:58:12 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 13980 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2004 23:58:11 +0000 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:54:20 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20041001005420.6ce149bc@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <415C9BF8.4040006@gossamer-threads.com> References: <41586F16.5020409@gentoo.org> <77d71529040929120567130db8@mail.gmail.com> <200409301101.25968.pauldv@gentoo.org> <8022edff04093005217eb25496@mail.gmail.com> <5a67a16f04093012157008318@mail.gmail.com> <5a67a16f04093014159fb7e@mail.gmail.com> <20040930225720.GA24975@tompayne.org> <415C9BF8.4040006@gossamer-threads.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__1_Oct_2004_00_54_20_+0100_+4ewAdi8_o1akEZ/" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: removing dhcpcd from system??? X-Archives-Salt: 4e7011c8-2599-4e35-a324-bb205c616850 X-Archives-Hash: 4f39c9b4507a6e924ddc4f30bb00eb8d --Signature=_Fri__1_Oct_2004_00_54_20_+0100_+4ewAdi8_o1akEZ/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:51:20 -0700 Jason Rhinelander wrote: | sys-devel/bc # Again, nice, but not necessary Necessary. Needed to compile various fairly important things. | it is really such a concern, wouldn't it be sufficient to add a 'dhcp' | USE flag to baselayout? If set, it could simply add | virtual/dhcp-client to RDEPEND. Yuck. I'm not a fan of USE flags which just pull in deps if they don't alter what's actually installed. Now, if the dhcp code in baselayout was optional (which it isn't and shouldn't be), a USE flag would make sense, but for just pulling in another package? Bleh... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Fri__1_Oct_2004_00_54_20_+0100_+4ewAdi8_o1akEZ/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBXJyu96zL6DUtXhERAqd3AJ9BuC1hcZNpV2b+64pWGTisL35/ugCffAV7 YcXJQ1SnPVs95VQiB0ThlPY= =hZaS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__1_Oct_2004_00_54_20_+0100_+4ewAdi8_o1akEZ/--