From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4316 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 09:19:07 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 09:19:07 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CCac5-0006MA-Hj for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:19:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 18388 invoked by uid 89); 29 Sep 2004 09:19:05 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 31934 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 09:19:04 +0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:19:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <41586F16.5020409@gentoo.org> <1096403028.26552.0.camel@dubb> <200409290016.23365.cparpart@surakware.net> In-Reply-To: <200409290016.23365.cparpart@surakware.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1506687.kZjeQaXlst"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409291119.01428.pauldv@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: removing dhcpcd from system??? X-Archives-Salt: caa57687-d9b3-4ab6-83ac-673839c65c23 X-Archives-Hash: eede6a3685e98c8d9aca914550e427be --nextPart1506687.kZjeQaXlst Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 29 September 2004 00:16, Christian Parpart wrote: > On Tuesday 28 September 2004 10:23 pm, G=E1bor Farkas wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 21:43 +0200, Christian Parpart wrote: > > > As I dislike python (sorry), too, I'd of course use a programming > > > language > > > that generates native code and supports high level programming > > > features like > > > C++ :) > > > > why is it important that it generates native code? > > easy, it's faster. however, this is no must of course. =46or most tasks of portage speed really really doesn't matter. There are=20 only a few parts of portage where speed is actually an issue and python=20 can interface with c/c++ easilly. The only valid reason for not wanting=20 python would be the ability to create a standalone (maybe even static)=20 version of portage. Paul ps. Compile times are not hindered at all by the use of python instead of=20 for example C =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1506687.kZjeQaXlst Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBWn4FbKx5DBjWFdsRAgO3AJ0RNGNcZVlCZj1abnIFD6rsKY9b2wCgk45A NOAD0g6AlpozRVqcn3pvh+k= =fda2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1506687.kZjeQaXlst--