From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-16169-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 4461 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 03:45:37 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 03:45:37 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CCVOs-0005Kg-6k for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 03:45:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 13592 invoked by uid 89); 29 Sep 2004 03:45:04 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 27184 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 03:45:02 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:42:49 -0400 X-OfflineIMAP-x2098034592-70696d656e7473656e64-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1096429502-0512100305738-v4.0.6 From: Aron Griffis <agriffis@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040929034249.GG16893@time.flatmonk.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <41586F16.5020409@gentoo.org> <1096322400.6229.8.camel@sephora> <4158C4C5.7060009@gentoo.org> <20040928193300.GF29561@mustard.zk3.dec.com> <4159CFD2.3050603@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9ADF8FXzFeE7X4jE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4159CFD2.3050603@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] removing dhcpcd from system??? X-Archives-Salt: 0194bdfe-7e8b-4f72-8ce0-64180967c218 X-Archives-Hash: 0be94aaa4c37f3c819f393e5efe8c89d --9ADF8FXzFeE7X4jE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Travis Tilley wrote: [Tue Sep 28 2004, 04:55:46PM EDT] > would you be averse to adding a virtual/dhcp-client that defaults to > something reasonable and then making this version of baselayout pdep > on it if dhcp or some other flag is in USE? i'm a more than willing > guinea pig. :) I'm not personally averse to this, but I would question pdep. Isn't rdep the right one in this case? Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer --9ADF8FXzFeE7X4jE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBWi85JrHF4yAQTrARAlR8AKCvyuqYC4fHnKsJtHclPOEENRRxCACeJkWQ qJ2D/tSgM1PslfoWUKy7t04= =z9iz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9ADF8FXzFeE7X4jE--