From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25987 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2004 09:37:33 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 09:37:33 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CCEQO-0005GS-QG for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:37:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 4214 invoked by uid 89); 28 Sep 2004 09:37:32 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20802 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2004 09:37:32 +0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:37:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200409281019.35486.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200409281024.31287.Peter.Ruskin@dsl.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <200409281024.31287.Peter.Ruskin@dsl.pipex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1643329.M5P654XDsx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409281137.30430.pauldv@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? X-Archives-Salt: f52d6959-6ad0-4a14-98a1-84f7cc3f22c2 X-Archives-Hash: 52b93645b97095d36750b8db55d16a12 --nextPart1643329.M5P654XDsx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 28 September 2004 11:24, Peter Ruskin wrote: > On Tuesday 28 September 2004 09:19, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > Do you realize that this would amount to serious patches on kde. KDE > > expects KDEDIR(S) to work the way it does currently. I know it is not > > ideal, but neither is the FHS. > > Well I think it *is* ideal the way we have it - that was one of the > many things that attracted me to Gentoo in the first place. It's the > most sensible way I've come across for organizing KDE/Qt and we should > not even consider abandoning it. Ideal to me would be a way that has the same power as the current way, but= =20 without getting on the edge of the FHS (so also pleasing the people who=20 value that greatly). I agree however that this is probably the best way=20 to do it as long as the FHS does not really offer support for our way of=20 operation. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1643329.M5P654XDsx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBWTDabKx5DBjWFdsRAjG7AJ0X3X7ODoBVwyygk21zT7Sl9BPw3gCdHodY +gTRH+UKeozEUpf0s4eZykI= =Qpm0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1643329.M5P654XDsx--