From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22441 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2004 16:27:43 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Sep 2004 16:27:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CBbsD-0002S8-VL for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:27:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 31289 invoked by uid 89); 26 Sep 2004 16:27:41 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 4076 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2004 16:27:40 +0000 Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:23:58 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: John Richard Moser Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040926172358.7f9f81c7@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <4156ECDC.7080109@comcast.net> References: <4151A04F.5090304@comcast.net> <200409251926.32676.blauwers@gentoo.org> <20040925185852.6352c326@enterprise.weeve.org> <41565E4B.6000808@comcast.net> <20040926140426.48b20bec@snowdrop.home> <4156ECDC.7080109@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__26_Sep_2004_17_23_58_+0100_ejMRT7lOAHbSsg_m" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons X-Archives-Salt: 6c764f8d-45ed-49e7-9194-75c237fb5db8 X-Archives-Hash: cb8cdac326a9df40d4694de884f23fbf --Signature=_Sun__26_Sep_2004_17_23_58_+0100_ejMRT7lOAHbSsg_m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:22:52 -0400 John Richard Moser wrote: | Is this breakage in SSP, or in the actual programs it breaks? (Does | SSP break a lot on sparc? That'd be a good indication) If it's SSP, | then perhaps someone could offer Etoh a shell and some chroots on a | sparc so he can try and fix it? On sparc, certain totally legit and very necessary non-broken programs work perfectly without SSP, and turning on SSP will guarantee that they will always fail. I'd say that's SSP's fault... -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Sun__26_Sep_2004_17_23_58_+0100_ejMRT7lOAHbSsg_m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBVu0i96zL6DUtXhERArt+AJ9r+l4bTNXO4wNcr+Lk0pZJLllHiwCg1rsU RBLzY/lOE2ZJs49PCzYPtsM= =Rzc0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__26_Sep_2004_17_23_58_+0100_ejMRT7lOAHbSsg_m--