From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27761 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2004 13:08:08 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Sep 2004 13:08:08 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CBYl5-0002je-Hf for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:08:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 23871 invoked by uid 89); 26 Sep 2004 13:08:06 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 13511 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2004 13:08:06 +0000 Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:04:26 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040926140426.48b20bec@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <41565E4B.6000808@comcast.net> References: <4151A04F.5090304@comcast.net> <200409251926.32676.blauwers@gentoo.org> <20040925185852.6352c326@enterprise.weeve.org> <41565E4B.6000808@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__26_Sep_2004_14_04_26_+0100_d9MnNwylxhDQ+E/A" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons X-Archives-Salt: 7d9ec490-67f5-46bb-98e0-b69dc1477744 X-Archives-Hash: b243d0034e1f6b10e1987ecb11dec955 --Signature=_Sun__26_Sep_2004_14_04_26_+0100_d9MnNwylxhDQ+E/A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:14:35 -0400 John Richard Moser wrote: | | Feel free to take on the ownership of making this work on every | | arch's toolchain then. Also feel free to deal with all upstream | | authors who start instantly dismissing any bugs from Gentoo due to | | the fact that the toolchain is quite modified to accomplish this | | task. Take the current stance the GAIM team has with us as an | | example of what would be to come. | | SSP works on all architectures. We already *know* that it breaks some critical things on sparc, and we've added in code to filter out ssp where appropriate. Fact is, you can't build a bootable sparc system if you remove these filters and build everything with -fstack-protector. | Yes and about 99.9999999% of your user base is probably going to say | "wha? SSP? Wassat?" if you ask them if they use SSP. Which can easily be solved by a few lines of documentation. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Sun__26_Sep_2004_14_04_26_+0100_d9MnNwylxhDQ+E/A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBVr5e96zL6DUtXhERAoJCAKDAGfwBAq8QyIt0d80MDWqYG3fyvQCgi6mq bZL1Iw31IRoPBsZyqslpVDs= =NGXN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__26_Sep_2004_14_04_26_+0100_d9MnNwylxhDQ+E/A--