From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20267 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2004 04:30:40 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Sep 2004 04:30:40 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CBQgK-0005BG-DQ for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 04:30:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 10639 invoked by uid 89); 26 Sep 2004 04:30:39 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 17016 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2004 04:30:39 +0000 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:30:26 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200409250339.23302.vapier@gentoo.org> <200409251652.27683.pauldv@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200409251652.27683.pauldv@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409260030.26423.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] swapping order of arguements for replace-cpu-flags X-Archives-Salt: 93888ac7-f7c9-44c0-a0bb-36f01e5f71a2 X-Archives-Hash: dfa0c60abe3bc75f8327cf6db5e1126d On Saturday 25 September 2004 10:52 am, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > To this respect it might be nice to have default replaces based on the > compiler version. I have an amd64, but when I tried to compile gcc-3.3 it > broke because (obviously) gcc-3.3 does not know -march=athlon64. A > replace-cpu flags statement in the package could have fixed it, but I > suspect that there are more places where this could come in handy. what you're asking for (while a good point) is outside the scope of replace-cpu-flags ... -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list