public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Spider <spider@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stack smash protected daemons
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:42:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040924144203.777bc93a.spider@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13cc2f7804092400233f19f417@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2050 bytes --]

begin  quote
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 03:23:25 -0400
Colin Kingsley <ckingsley@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just to let everybody know, media-libs/sdl-gfx-2.0.11 does not compile
> with -fstack-protector on my system. This may not be a big deal, and
> may not affect other versions, or even other systems. My CFLAGS are
> very agressive, so there may be some sort of negative interaction
> occuring. For anybody who cares, the error follows.
> 
>  ERROR: compile /root/.ccache/SDL_imageF.tmp.tercel.18871.i on
> 128.151.130.131 failed
> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> {standard input}:6709: Error: symbol `.L1010' is already defined
> {standard input}:6711: Error: symbol `.L1015' is already defined
> {standard input}:6721: Error: symbol `.L1013' is already defined
> {standard input}:6916: Error: symbol `.L1023' is already defined
> {standard input}:6926: Error: symbol `.L1021' is already defined
> {standard input}:6932: Error: symbol `.L1017' is already defined
> {standard input}:7200: Error: symbol `.L1016' is already defined
> {standard input}:7226: Error: symbol `.L1031' is already defined
> {standard input}:7236: Error: symbol `.L1029' is already defined
> {standard input}:7352: Error: symbol `.L1026' is already defined
> make: *** [SDL_imageFilter.lo] Error 1


Just a side-note to say that I've got just this package running and
working with -fstack-protector.

I can also add that I've been doing x86 stable tracking with
-fstack-protector for almost a year now, sometimes things break, but
bugreports have been filed and things have been very smooth the last few
months.


+1  for recommending it to default.

Can somone take the time to benchmark this properly though?  we rather
shouldn't have many "oh this sucks 15% cpu"  rumours without substance. 
both string and integer, small and large software.

Some of the more interesting parts would be fex.  python performance and
performance of python apps.

//Spider


-- 
begin  .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-09-24 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-22 15:54 [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons John Richard Moser
2004-09-22 16:04 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-22 17:06   ` Elfyn McBratney
2004-09-22 17:30   ` Marius Mauch
2004-09-22 21:13   ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23  0:11     ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-23  0:27       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23  0:38         ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23  0:42           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23  2:40             ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23 14:47               ` Marius Mauch
2004-09-23 19:03                 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23 20:28                   ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-23 20:35                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23 20:53                       ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-23 21:11                         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23  1:40         ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23  1:55           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23  2:24             ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23  1:48         ` Dave Monnier
2004-09-23  2:03         ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-23  2:08           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23  2:25             ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23  2:34             ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-23  3:12               ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23  2:41             ` Colin Kingsley
2004-09-23  2:47             ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23 23:29           ` Daniel Goller
2004-09-24  0:28           ` Jason Stubbs
2004-09-25 16:32             ` Bart Lauwers
2004-09-23  1:41       ` Christian Birchinger
2004-09-23 23:27   ` Daniel Goller
2004-09-23 23:27     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-22 16:48 ` Rumen Yotov
2004-09-22 17:59 ` Lance Albertson
2004-09-22 21:35   ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-22 21:53     ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-22 23:49 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-22 23:17   ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-09-23  0:26     ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23  0:37       ` Marius Mauch
2004-09-23  1:51         ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23  2:44           ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23 14:55           ` Marius Mauch
2004-09-23 20:10             ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-24  0:41         ` Jason Stubbs
2004-09-24  0:46           ` Jason Stubbs
2004-09-24  0:52             ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-24  1:55               ` Marius Mauch
2004-09-23  4:01 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23  4:06   ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23  5:26   ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-23  5:32     ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23  8:31     ` [gentoo-dev] " Thierry Carrez
2004-09-23 14:05       ` Thierry Carrez
2004-09-23 16:27         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23 17:45           ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-24  3:21         ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-24  6:02           ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-24  6:34             ` Colin Kingsley
2004-09-24  6:34             ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-24  7:23               ` Colin Kingsley
2004-09-24 11:41                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-24 12:42                 ` Spider [this message]
2004-09-24 13:03                   ` Colin Kingsley
2004-09-24 13:10                   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-24 15:48                   ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-24 19:00                     ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-25  1:19                     ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-09-25  3:04                       ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-25 10:55                         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-09-23 17:27       ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-security] " John Richard Moser
2004-09-25 17:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Lauwers
2004-09-25 17:35   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-25 21:42     ` Bart Lauwers
2004-09-25 22:29       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-25 23:46         ` Bart Lauwers
2004-09-25 23:54           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-27  8:02             ` Thierry Carrez
2004-09-26  0:18           ` Stephen P. Becker
2004-09-26  1:22       ` Jason Stubbs
2004-09-25 17:43   ` Rumen Yotov
2004-09-26  0:58   ` Jason Wever
2004-09-26  6:14     ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-26 13:04       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-26 16:22         ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-26 16:23           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-26 15:52       ` Stephen P. Becker
2004-09-26 16:18         ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-26 16:22           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-26 16:29           ` Stephen P. Becker
2004-09-26 16:11       ` Jason Wever
2004-09-26 16:41         ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-26 17:25           ` [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons [blah] Kumba
2004-09-26  6:39     ` [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons Rumen Yotov
2004-09-26 10:14       ` Colin Kingsley
2004-09-26 18:36         ` Jon Portnoy
2004-09-26 18:39 ` John Richard Moser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040924144203.777bc93a.spider@gentoo.org \
    --to=spider@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox