From: Spider <spider@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stack smash protected daemons
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:42:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040924144203.777bc93a.spider@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13cc2f7804092400233f19f417@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2050 bytes --]
begin quote
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 03:23:25 -0400
Colin Kingsley <ckingsley@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just to let everybody know, media-libs/sdl-gfx-2.0.11 does not compile
> with -fstack-protector on my system. This may not be a big deal, and
> may not affect other versions, or even other systems. My CFLAGS are
> very agressive, so there may be some sort of negative interaction
> occuring. For anybody who cares, the error follows.
>
> ERROR: compile /root/.ccache/SDL_imageF.tmp.tercel.18871.i on
> 128.151.130.131 failed
> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> {standard input}:6709: Error: symbol `.L1010' is already defined
> {standard input}:6711: Error: symbol `.L1015' is already defined
> {standard input}:6721: Error: symbol `.L1013' is already defined
> {standard input}:6916: Error: symbol `.L1023' is already defined
> {standard input}:6926: Error: symbol `.L1021' is already defined
> {standard input}:6932: Error: symbol `.L1017' is already defined
> {standard input}:7200: Error: symbol `.L1016' is already defined
> {standard input}:7226: Error: symbol `.L1031' is already defined
> {standard input}:7236: Error: symbol `.L1029' is already defined
> {standard input}:7352: Error: symbol `.L1026' is already defined
> make: *** [SDL_imageFilter.lo] Error 1
Just a side-note to say that I've got just this package running and
working with -fstack-protector.
I can also add that I've been doing x86 stable tracking with
-fstack-protector for almost a year now, sometimes things break, but
bugreports have been filed and things have been very smooth the last few
months.
+1 for recommending it to default.
Can somone take the time to benchmark this properly though? we rather
shouldn't have many "oh this sucks 15% cpu" rumours without substance.
both string and integer, small and large software.
Some of the more interesting parts would be fex. python performance and
performance of python apps.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-24 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-22 15:54 [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons John Richard Moser
2004-09-22 16:04 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-22 17:06 ` Elfyn McBratney
2004-09-22 17:30 ` Marius Mauch
2004-09-22 21:13 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23 0:11 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-23 0:27 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23 0:38 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23 0:42 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23 2:40 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23 14:47 ` Marius Mauch
2004-09-23 19:03 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23 20:28 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-23 20:35 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23 20:53 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-23 21:11 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23 1:40 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23 1:55 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23 2:24 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23 1:48 ` Dave Monnier
2004-09-23 2:03 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-23 2:08 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23 2:25 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23 2:34 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-23 3:12 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23 2:41 ` Colin Kingsley
2004-09-23 2:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23 23:29 ` Daniel Goller
2004-09-24 0:28 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-09-25 16:32 ` Bart Lauwers
2004-09-23 1:41 ` Christian Birchinger
2004-09-23 23:27 ` Daniel Goller
2004-09-23 23:27 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-22 16:48 ` Rumen Yotov
2004-09-22 17:59 ` Lance Albertson
2004-09-22 21:35 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-22 21:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-22 23:49 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-22 23:17 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-09-23 0:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23 0:37 ` Marius Mauch
2004-09-23 1:51 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23 2:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23 14:55 ` Marius Mauch
2004-09-23 20:10 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-24 0:41 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-09-24 0:46 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-09-24 0:52 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-24 1:55 ` Marius Mauch
2004-09-23 4:01 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23 4:06 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-23 5:26 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-23 5:32 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-09-23 8:31 ` [gentoo-dev] " Thierry Carrez
2004-09-23 14:05 ` Thierry Carrez
2004-09-23 16:27 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-23 17:45 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-24 3:21 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-24 6:02 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-24 6:34 ` Colin Kingsley
2004-09-24 6:34 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-24 7:23 ` Colin Kingsley
2004-09-24 11:41 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-24 12:42 ` Spider [this message]
2004-09-24 13:03 ` Colin Kingsley
2004-09-24 13:10 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-24 15:48 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-24 19:00 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-25 1:19 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-09-25 3:04 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-25 10:55 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-09-23 17:27 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-security] " John Richard Moser
2004-09-25 17:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Lauwers
2004-09-25 17:35 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-25 21:42 ` Bart Lauwers
2004-09-25 22:29 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-25 23:46 ` Bart Lauwers
2004-09-25 23:54 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-27 8:02 ` Thierry Carrez
2004-09-26 0:18 ` Stephen P. Becker
2004-09-26 1:22 ` Jason Stubbs
2004-09-25 17:43 ` Rumen Yotov
2004-09-26 0:58 ` Jason Wever
2004-09-26 6:14 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-26 13:04 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-26 16:22 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-26 16:23 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-26 15:52 ` Stephen P. Becker
2004-09-26 16:18 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-26 16:22 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-26 16:29 ` Stephen P. Becker
2004-09-26 16:11 ` Jason Wever
2004-09-26 16:41 ` John Richard Moser
2004-09-26 17:25 ` [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons [blah] Kumba
2004-09-26 6:39 ` [gentoo-dev] Stack smash protected daemons Rumen Yotov
2004-09-26 10:14 ` Colin Kingsley
2004-09-26 18:36 ` Jon Portnoy
2004-09-26 18:39 ` John Richard Moser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040924144203.777bc93a.spider@gentoo.org \
--to=spider@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox