From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26087 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2004 11:45:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Sep 2004 11:45:02 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CAoVa-0001Bu-2Y for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:45:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 29099 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2004 11:45:01 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21452 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2004 11:45:01 +0000 Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:41:40 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040924124140.4d19c401@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <13cc2f7804092400233f19f417@mail.gmail.com> References: <4151A04F.5090304@comcast.net> <41524A85.1020402@comcast.net> <1095917198.29656.64.camel@simple> <415289CF.7070708@gentoo.org> <4152D819.4070205@gentoo.org> <415392BD.1010905@comcast.net> <1096005720.12931.107.camel@simple> <4153BFF0.4000005@comcast.net> <13cc2f7804092400233f19f417@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__24_Sep_2004_12_41_40_+0100_UG72A2uLMVXJL3RJ" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stack smash protected daemons X-Archives-Salt: 6b59c35d-ecf1-4761-8bf9-560bf9af852c X-Archives-Hash: 6d0d0652265fe020c488e900165b78b9 --Signature=_Fri__24_Sep_2004_12_41_40_+0100_UG72A2uLMVXJL3RJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 03:23:25 -0400 Colin Kingsley wrote: | Just to let everybody know, media-libs/sdl-gfx-2.0.11 does not compile | with -fstack-protector on my system. This may not be a big deal, and | may not affect other versions, or even other systems. My CFLAGS are | very agressive, so there may be some sort of negative interaction | occuring. For anybody who cares, the error follows. If you're sure it's -fstack-protector causing it, file a bug. It's easy enough to filter particular flags on a per-ebuild basis, and I'd imagine we'll be seeing a few more of these if we stick -fstack-protector in the default flags... Plus maybe this'll make those people who have strip-flags overridden so that it does nothing have second thoughts :) -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Fri__24_Sep_2004_12_41_40_+0100_UG72A2uLMVXJL3RJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBVAf296zL6DUtXhERAm+VAKDJ7m7zLmi1kvocV4HlgOtR1MZeqgCeP+TP zyyYPj+ErcXfcvGximiO8Gs= =7Lp2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__24_Sep_2004_12_41_40_+0100_UG72A2uLMVXJL3RJ--