From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9246 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2004 13:49:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Sep 2004 13:49:58 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1C9l1p-00082h-JI for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:49:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 17062 invoked by uid 89); 21 Sep 2004 13:49:57 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 28526 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2004 13:49:56 +0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:49:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <1095698465.10417.24.camel@antares.hausnetz> <1095709646.29150.32.camel@woot.uberdavis.com> <1095772529.27691.249.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1095772529.27691.249.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3327802.sYzTWKxbQZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409211549.56435.pauldv@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="acl" in profiles X-Archives-Salt: 192bef94-008d-46e9-978f-d2ebc5b75d39 X-Archives-Hash: 81869f2a2d2c2b5371c2e1f4ad2683a5 --nextPart3327802.sYzTWKxbQZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 21 September 2004 15:15, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 15:47, John Davis wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 18:41 +0200, Benjamin Judas wrote: > > > What do you think about it and how do you think this should be solved? > > > > I'd say go ahead and remove it from the stages. IIRC, the acl use in the > > stages is a hold over from the 1.4 days. > > This means users will not be able to install using ext2/3/reiserfs/xfs > with acl support. While I don't see any problems keeping acl, it is no problem at all to enab= le=20 acl's on those filesystems after installation. The default stages do not=20 contain acl's in any case so any advantage for installing on an acl enabled= =20 filesystem are not there. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart3327802.sYzTWKxbQZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBUDGEbKx5DBjWFdsRAmwiAJ4lPi3iq99eS9PLkDvwGwR4MIQulwCfS6AK tjKe2Zyuv0ZVT2NCzFIHa8c= =0A3J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3327802.sYzTWKxbQZ--