From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11382 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2004 16:43:29 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Sep 2004 16:43:29 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1C9RGC-00055t-W3 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:43:29 +0000 Received: (qmail 15153 invoked by uid 89); 20 Sep 2004 16:43:28 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 27236 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2004 16:43:28 +0000 From: Dan Armak Reply-To: danarmak@gentoo.org Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc. To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:44:38 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200409201822.26316.carlo@gentoo.org> <200409201836.12369@malte.stretz.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <200409201836.12369@malte.stretz.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2073205.L271igvklg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409201944.43708.danarmak@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? X-Archives-Salt: e7bf1162-5963-4b60-bc04-bd4248b6950c X-Archives-Hash: a29239435e5c06799d1fd8f58d011687 --nextPart2073205.L271igvklg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 20 September 2004 19:36, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > That's actually a good point. Theoretically its possible to share some > parts of the system across several machines, which is of course complicat= ed > by a /foo/kde/x.y/share directory structure. So most probably your > suggestion is the best till now (and also one of the alternatives which w= as > discussed for KDE 4). A directory /usr/bin/kde/x.y feels weird on the > first glance, but why not? I don't understand this point. Could you please elaborate? Why is /usr/bin/= kde=20 better than either /usr/kde or /usr/packages/kde? Do you mean that kde shou= ld=20 be split between /usr/{bin,lib,share,include,...}/kde/ dirs? Specifying such separate dirs rather than a unified KDEDIR/KDEDIRS looks, a= t=20 first sight, to be a major PITA. Maybe they'll improve support for this in= =20 kde4, but I don't relish the thought of doing it with 3.x. Unless there's a= =20 way already to specify such separated dirs via env variables a la KDEDIRS=20 that I'm not aware of? =2D-=20 Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Matan, Israel Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key =46ingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 --nextPart2073205.L271igvklg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBTwj7UI2RQ41fiVERAs+oAJ95BwFbkiGMWbkiuPKnrsnWlxpL+wCdGpXr KJPaQudCSOgG1e7sO7kHF9M= =knrD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2073205.L271igvklg--