From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-15845-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 18054 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2004 03:50:48 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Sep 2004 03:50:48 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1C9FCR-0007JZ-6z for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 03:50:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 26066 invoked by uid 89); 20 Sep 2004 03:50:46 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 837 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2004 03:50:45 +0000 From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@utopios.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 03:50:41 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <ciknvv$b70$1@sea.gmane.org> <200409200004.03577.luke-jr@utopios.org> <20040920015546.233e8e82@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20040920015546.233e8e82@snowdrop.home> IM-Address: luke-jr@jabber.org Public-GPG-Key-URI: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xD53E9583 Public-GPG-Key: 0xD53E9583 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2035890.D8ABFRtpiB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409200350.48701.luke-jr@utopios.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? X-Archives-Salt: 15c39c34-c78a-489f-895e-e6efd91af27f X-Archives-Hash: 33fdbcef8100fa6075bff121b991c793 --nextPart2035890.D8ABFRtpiB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 20 September 2004 12:55 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:03:59 +0000 Luke-Jr <luke-jr@utopios.org> wrote: > | Exactly. For a *system administrator* to *temporarily* mount a > | filesystem in. This means 'mount some-temp-filesystem /mnt' > | temporarily, not 'mount /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom; mount /dev/fd0 > | /mnt/floppy; etc' perminantly.-- > > Why have a specific toplevel for that? No need, just use cwd or $HOME. > Surely you don't think the FHS is thaaaaat silly? If the LSB can be silly enough to require RPM, why can't the FHS be silly=20 enough to require a silly toplevel? > By 'temporary' they've gotta mean 'not always mounted'. And they do... However, the mount point is /mnt, not /mnt/* Also, on many systems, /mnt/cdrom etc *are* always mounted ... as=20 supermount. :) > Anything else is madness.=20 No comment. =2D-=20 Luke-Jr Developer, Utopios http://utopios.org/ --nextPart2035890.D8ABFRtpiB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBBTlOYZl/BHdU+lYMRAiXTAJ9Ism22uoUMCLKpTQ+0q4tUpRzkeQCVFMtO twFmlYP37WJ7iErSbL4SCw== =w60e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2035890.D8ABFRtpiB--