public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Segregating KDE?
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:46:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200409192146.18527.pauldv@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409191756.18289.danarmak@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2028 bytes --]

On Sunday 19 September 2004 16:56, Dan Armak wrote:
> On Sunday 19 September 2004 07:43, Duncan wrote:
> > Then, at the top of the file put a big hairy warning about how some
> > package components, particularly in kdebase, are depended on by others,
> > and to disable the use flag and recompile all packages if there are
> > dependency issues, and then leave everything else up to the user.  Any
> > bugs on related dependency issues would be marked invalid, see the
> > warning in the file, etc. so it wouldn't become a big support issue.
>
> As you say, this solution is hairy (or anything else that doesn't create
> real separate ebuilds for the separate apps). I personally don't like it at
> all and don't really want to see it happen even as an alternative to
> nothing at all, because it's so ugly. Of course, it's very easy to
> implement, but it takes away all the advantages of having a proper package
> manager - all the advantages of using portage rather than state-less
> invocations on the order of 'ebuild.sh file.ebuild'...
>
> And of course this solution entails more or less not supporting it despite
> having it in the portage tree - marking related bugs as invalid etc. That's
> another reason I don't like it.
>
> Perhaps I don't have the right to say this at this point, having been
> incative for over a year, but this solution simply takes away too much
> functionality and support from the user in order to decrease the
> maintainer's workload.

Well, I'll second you in any case. It is not a solution and offering something 
willingly and then saying it is unsupported is in these kinds of cases a 
medicine worse than the cure. The only "possible" solution I see would 
involve useflags and useflag dependencies (still "in the works"). But I agree 
that we must avoid in any case to get back the stateless mess that the lack 
of dependency tracking entails.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-19 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-18  7:57 [gentoo-dev] Segregating KDE? Anthony Gorecki
2004-09-18  9:16 ` Dan Armak
2004-09-18 18:02   ` Anthony Gorecki
2004-09-18 18:29     ` Dan Armak
2004-09-18 18:31       ` Dan Armak
2004-09-18 19:19         ` Seemant Kulleen
2004-09-18 19:36           ` Dan Armak
2004-09-19  8:30             ` Simone Gotti
2004-09-19 14:48               ` Dan Armak
2004-09-19 18:08                 ` Simone Gotti
2004-09-19 19:33                   ` Dan Armak
2004-09-19 19:42                     ` Dan Armak
2004-09-19 19:59                       ` Dan Armak
2004-09-19 21:00                     ` Simone Gotti
2004-09-21  0:10                     ` Simone Gotti
2004-09-18 19:09       ` Anthony Gorecki
2004-09-18 19:45         ` Dan Armak
2004-09-18 20:13           ` Anthony Gorecki
2004-09-18 20:33             ` Sami Samhuri
2004-09-18 20:33               ` Anthony Gorecki
2004-09-18 20:38             ` Dan Armak
2004-09-18 20:40               ` Dan Armak
2004-09-19  4:43     ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2004-09-19 14:56       ` Dan Armak
2004-09-19 19:46         ` Paul de Vrieze [this message]
2004-09-18 13:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Caleb Tennis
2004-09-18 14:06   ` Nick Dimiduk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200409192146.18527.pauldv@gentoo.org \
    --to=pauldv@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox