From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-15820-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 22368 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2004 19:55:11 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Sep 2004 19:55:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1C97mI-0001SA-8m for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:55:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 16142 invoked by uid 89); 19 Sep 2004 19:55:09 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 22625 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2004 19:55:09 +0000 Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:52:09 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040919205209.0ece7c7d@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <ciknvv$b70$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <ciknvv$b70$1@sea.gmane.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__19_Sep_2004_20_52_09_+0100_DVH+xun_m/FrXvdx" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? X-Archives-Salt: 266b71e9-30c7-4531-b14f-2e6a86f56193 X-Archives-Hash: ff71f6bc1e84ec20bce3b2d3ec6ab8bf --Signature=_Sun__19_Sep_2004_20_52_09_+0100_DVH+xun_m/FrXvdx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:50:46 +0200 Thomas Weidner <3.14159@gmx.net> wrote: | I know the current version works, but it conflicts | with the FHS (and therefore with the LSB). LSB compliance isn't exactly high on our list of priorities... FHS, maybe, but definitely not LSB. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Sun__19_Sep_2004_20_52_09_+0100_DVH+xun_m/FrXvdx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBTeNs96zL6DUtXhERAuyLAKC64PHQstcvTj8LgTbrfFOwVVT4vACgsVjM 4Ep5s3mUwxpVCbvAvNcnRT8= =J9lk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__19_Sep_2004_20_52_09_+0100_DVH+xun_m/FrXvdx--