From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12722 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2004 20:13:57 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Sep 2004 20:13:57 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1C984S-0000ce-Hl for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:14:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 9850 invoked by uid 89); 19 Sep 2004 20:13:55 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 9405 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2004 20:13:55 +0000 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:07:31 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20040919205209.0ece7c7d@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20040919205209.0ece7c7d@snowdrop.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409191607.31651.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] any interest in removing /usr/qt and /usr/kde ? X-Archives-Salt: 2c012d89-35a0-4e80-91d0-61ab4138e4a1 X-Archives-Hash: 245952a7a175dd8f28826161dc1bc482 On Sunday 19 September 2004 03:52 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > LSB compliance isn't exactly high on our list of priorities... FHS, > maybe, but definitely not LSB. LSB is much more than a filesystem spec which is why we dont bend over backwards for it, but FHS is something we try for and yes, the way we install KDE/QT fly in the face of FHS ... but it does allow us to easily SLOT kde versions ... -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list