From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16997 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2004 20:39:37 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Sep 2004 20:39:37 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1C8lzi-0005i8-4z for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 20:39:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 21606 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2004 20:39:36 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 15390 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2004 20:39:36 +0000 From: Dan Armak Reply-To: danarmak@gentoo.org Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc. To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:40:29 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200409180057.34014.anthony@ectrolinux.com> <200409181313.24912.anthony@ectrolinux.com> <200409182338.24134.danarmak@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200409182338.24134.danarmak@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2088654.4zrAo44Ixp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409182340.30047.danarmak@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Segregating KDE? X-Archives-Salt: e87ef816-93a9-4b92-91c2-8fb7826f528e X-Archives-Hash: eab8725f570ecb9d2d97f3838a43af2d --nextPart2088654.4zrAo44Ixp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 18 September 2004 23:38, Dan Armak wrote: > I was talking about the recently proposed, and still experimental afaik, > 'configure cache' patch to portage, posted to this list on September 10th > by Stuart Hebert: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/confcache/ > > It caches the tests run by configure scripts. I haven't tried it yet and > haven't seen any reports on how well it works for kde specifically. We > -need- a solution to the configure script run times issue, as described in > #11123. If that's not resolved, no amount of maintainer manpower can help, > because the move to separate ebuilds would mean a large increase in > emerging time for people who do want all of kde. If this configure cache > works well and is accepted into portage, it'd be the best possible soluti= on > to the problem. =2E..Which is why we've been dismissive of this issue until just now: no su= ch=20 config cache, or an laternative solution to the problem, was available. =2D-=20 Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Matan, Israel Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key =46ingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 --nextPart2088654.4zrAo44Ixp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBTJ0+UI2RQ41fiVERAv3XAJ4+090f2liKOCR4eMUg2feIEgnSkACfb172 5OXBCfXflIrlwkAOy/N2nUo= =vZ/8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2088654.4zrAo44Ixp--