From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5602 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 23:25:39 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 23:25:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C85dC-0005sB-Iz for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:25:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 21542 invoked by uid 89); 16 Sep 2004 23:25:38 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 224 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 23:25:37 +0000 From: Michiel de Bruijne To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 01:25:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <1094392845.2540.14.camel@woot.uberdavis.com> <20040905234423.GW23171@mail.lieber.org> In-Reply-To: <20040905234423.GW23171@mail.lieber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409170125.36105.m.debruijne@hccnet.nl> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo's policy on sender id X-Archives-Salt: 3b1f20f8-f058-4c83-b023-419f38a47029 X-Archives-Hash: e297ef7c45e16ef27c2f5f48fe772fa0 On Monday 06 September 2004 01:44, Kurt Lieber wrote: > On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 10:00:45AM -0400 or thereabouts, John Davis wrote: > > Hi all - > > Recent [1] announcements [2] from other large projects have prompted > > this inquiry - should Gentoo adopt similar policies regarding Sender ID > > and make a public statement or is it not worth our time? > > I left Debian in large part because of the stupid politics that went on in > that project. I want a distribution that bases its decisions on technical > reasons, rather than political ones. > > Also, for the record, regardless of what decisions are made regarding > including support for SenderID in portage, we *will* be implementing > SenderID on our infrastructure. > > --kurt Just out of curiosity; what functionality does Sender ID provide that Sender Policy Framework (SPF) doesn't? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list