From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24607 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 14:13:43 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 14:13:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C7x14-0003Ft-GU for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:13:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 18297 invoked by uid 89); 16 Sep 2004 14:13:41 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 9503 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 14:13:41 +0000 From: Heinrich Wendel Organization: Gentoo Foundation To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:13:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200409141806.45658.anthony@ectrolinux.com> <1095260003.6268.6.camel@localhost> <200409161607.39441.lanius@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200409161607.39441.lanius@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409161613.33238.lanius@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage prelink patch? X-Archives-Salt: a8d3b7e9-6e91-40aa-aeb7-d4f24a6f5732 X-Archives-Hash: 4465b134ccb2fd06c82902ae9f996ad2 On Thursday 16 September 2004 16:07, Heinrich Wendel wrote: > On Wednesday 15 September 2004 16:53, Stefan Jones wrote: > > grep prelink /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage.py > > gives lots of crap ... > > > > So it is still there! In fact there is a trivial patch waiting to be > > merged for prelink. So portage is prelink enabled, it just does not run > > the prelink command automatically . > > Since it is a trivial patch I hope you can get it in for portage-2.0.51. Is this http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63563 or is there another patch which automatically prelinks new installed binaries/libraries? > > > This was because prelink was slightly buggy and could not be relied on > > the succeed and took too long to run. > > > > Newer versions of prelink are much better so there could be a new case > > to make portage run prelink after a (un)merge automatically. > > > > But I cannot be bothered to push the idea (laziness). > > > > Stefan > > mfg, heinrich :) mfg, heinrich :) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list