* [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
@ 2004-07-19 13:06 Stuart Herbert
2004-07-19 13:32 ` Georgi Georgiev
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stuart Herbert @ 2004-07-19 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: klieber, carlos
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1070 bytes --]
(Kurt - can you put this on www.g.o plz? thanks)
Hi,
Week starting 2nd August 2004, we will be moving *all* of the packages
currently in net-www to new homes in the Portage tree. net-www has outgrown
its original purpose, and the new categories that we are adding will make it
much easier for users to find the packages they want.
The full list of packages are here:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/www-split.txt
WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO:
Portage will automatically upgrade any packages you have installed the next
time you run emerge -u. However, you will manually need to fix any entries
in /etc/portage/package.* to refer to the new categories.
Many thanks,
Stu
--
Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
--
[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-07-19 13:06 [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired Stuart Herbert
@ 2004-07-19 13:32 ` Georgi Georgiev
2004-07-19 20:49 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-07-19 16:56 ` Sergey Borodich
2004-09-15 19:48 ` Stuart Herbert
2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Georgi Georgiev @ 2004-07-19 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 980 bytes --]
maillog: 19/07/2004-14:06:25(+0100): Stuart Herbert types
> (Kurt - can you put this on www.g.o plz? thanks)
>
> Hi,
>
> Week starting 2nd August 2004, we will be moving *all* of the packages
> currently in net-www to new homes in the Portage tree. net-www has outgrown
> its original purpose, and the new categories that we are adding will make it
> much easier for users to find the packages they want.
>
> The full list of packages are here:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/www-split.txt
I guess this is the oportune moment to address
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15079
I mean, prozilla is as much a www-client as wget or d4x are.
--
) Georgi Georgiev ) [Crash programs] fail because they are )
( chutz@gg3.net ( based on the theory that, with nine women (
) +81(90)6266-1163 ) pregnant, you can get a baby a month. -- )
( ------------------- ( Wernher von Braun (
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-07-19 13:06 [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired Stuart Herbert
2004-07-19 13:32 ` Georgi Georgiev
@ 2004-07-19 16:56 ` Sergey Borodich
2004-07-19 20:53 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-15 19:48 ` Stuart Herbert
2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Borodich @ 2004-07-19 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: stuart, gentoo-dev
Hello, Stuart Herbert ! On 07/19/2004 04:06 PM you wrote
> (Kurt - can you put this on www.g.o plz? thanks)
>
> Hi,
>
> Week starting 2nd August 2004, we will be moving *all* of the packages
> currently in net-www to new homes in the Portage tree. net-www has outgrown
> its original purpose, and the new categories that we are adding will make it
> much easier for users to find the packages they want.
>
> The full list of packages are here:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/www-split.txt
>
> WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO:
>
> Portage will automatically upgrade any packages you have installed the next
> time you run emerge -u. However, you will manually need to fix any entries
> in /etc/portage/package.* to refer to the new categories.
>
I think mozplugger and netscape-plugger must be in www-plugin
--
Sergey Borodich
http://bor.org.ua
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-07-19 13:32 ` Georgi Georgiev
@ 2004-07-19 20:49 ` Stuart Herbert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stuart Herbert @ 2004-07-19 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 713 bytes --]
On Monday 19 July 2004 14:32, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> I guess this is the oportune moment to address
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15079
>
> I mean, prozilla is as much a www-client as wget or d4x are.
Ah - I missed this bug. I've updated the list to show that prozilla is now
going into net-misc.
Thanks,
Stu
--
Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
--
[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-07-19 16:56 ` Sergey Borodich
@ 2004-07-19 20:53 ` Stuart Herbert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stuart Herbert @ 2004-07-19 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 575 bytes --]
On Monday 19 July 2004 17:56, Sergey Borodich wrote:
> I think mozplugger and netscape-plugger must be in www-plugin
Thanks. I've updated the list to include this change.
Best regards,
Stu
--
Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
--
[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-07-19 13:06 [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired Stuart Herbert
2004-07-19 13:32 ` Georgi Georgiev
2004-07-19 16:56 ` Sergey Borodich
@ 2004-09-15 19:48 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-15 20:10 ` Donnie Berkholz
2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stuart Herbert @ 2004-09-15 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1380 bytes --]
On Monday 19 July 2004 14:06, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Week starting 2nd August 2004, we will be moving *all* of the packages
> currently in net-www to new homes in the Portage tree. net-www has
> outgrown its original purpose, and the new categories that we are adding
> will make it much easier for users to find the packages they want.
I'll shortly be starting work on moving apache-related packages.
To make life easier for everyone - at the expense of a one-off bit of pain -
I'm thinking of splitting the apache packages into TWO categories:
- www-apache1 for apache1 packages
- www-apache2 for apache2 packages
This will be a giant leap towards getting rid of the apache USE flag pain, and
the associated noise / bugs that result from this.
The main downside with this proposal is that I haven't figured out an
automatic way for users to upgrade to the correct apache1/apache2 packages
after the split. Any ideas would be welcome.
Best regards,
Stu
--
Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
--
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-09-15 19:48 ` Stuart Herbert
@ 2004-09-15 20:10 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-09-15 20:22 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-16 10:43 ` Michiel de Bruijne
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Donnie Berkholz @ 2004-09-15 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 936 bytes --]
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 12:48, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> I'll shortly be starting work on moving apache-related packages.
>
> To make life easier for everyone - at the expense of a one-off bit of pain -
> I'm thinking of splitting the apache packages into TWO categories:
>
> - www-apache1 for apache1 packages
> - www-apache2 for apache2 packages
>
> This will be a giant leap towards getting rid of the apache USE flag pain, and
> the associated noise / bugs that result from this.
If there's a way to get portage to work better without this kind of
splitting, I'd much rather see that happen. Perhaps SLOTting by what
it's built for (apache-1/2)? I'm not real clear on the current
situation.
Splitting in this way really goes against the whole idea of portage
allowing us to integrate versioned packages into one using a combination
of USE flags, SLOTs and other tools.
--
Donnie Berkholz
Gentoo Linux
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-09-15 20:10 ` Donnie Berkholz
@ 2004-09-15 20:22 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-15 20:48 ` Doug Goldstein
2004-09-16 10:43 ` Michiel de Bruijne
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stuart Herbert @ 2004-09-15 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1252 bytes --]
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 21:10, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> If there's a way to get portage to work better without this kind of
> splitting, I'd much rather see that happen. Perhaps SLOTting by what
> it's built for (apache-1/2)? I'm not real clear on the current
> situation.
SLOTing is great when (say) verison 1.2 of a package works with both apache
and apache2, but it's not a complete solution when you need version 1.2 for
apache, but version 2.2 for apache2.
We can tell users to use /etc/portage/package.mask, but I want to get this
stuff working automatically, without the user having to do anything.
> Splitting in this way really goes against the whole idea of portage
> allowing us to integrate versioned packages into one using a combination
> of USE flags, SLOTs and other tools.
I'm open to better suggestions.
Best regards,
Stu
--
Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
--
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-09-15 20:22 ` Stuart Herbert
@ 2004-09-15 20:48 ` Doug Goldstein
2004-09-15 22:14 ` Allen Parker
2004-09-15 22:30 ` Stuart Herbert
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Doug Goldstein @ 2004-09-15 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
I'm actually the maintainer of a couple of Apache modules (currently not
included in Portage but shortly I'll look to include them when I
stablize them a bit more) that I have the codebase support both Apache 1
and Apache 2 through a mess of #DEFINE and ./configure but I did that to
make it easier for users. With this scheme the package would have to
appear in two catagories under the same name and it would conflict with
the other one and provide an ugly mess. Heck.... every package... like
emerge mod_perl wouldn't even work.. it'd give you an ugly message
saying which one? www-apache1/mod-perl or www-apache2/mod-perl... Not
ideal in my book. There's got to be a better way about this.
Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 September 2004 21:10, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
>>If there's a way to get portage to work better without this kind of
>>splitting, I'd much rather see that happen. Perhaps SLOTting by what
>>it's built for (apache-1/2)? I'm not real clear on the current
>>situation.
>
>
> SLOTing is great when (say) verison 1.2 of a package works with both apache
> and apache2, but it's not a complete solution when you need version 1.2 for
> apache, but version 2.2 for apache2.
>
> We can tell users to use /etc/portage/package.mask, but I want to get this
> stuff working automatically, without the user having to do anything.
>
>
>>Splitting in this way really goes against the whole idea of portage
>>allowing us to integrate versioned packages into one using a combination
>>of USE flags, SLOTs and other tools.
>
>
> I'm open to better suggestions.
>
> Best regards,
> Stu
--
Doug Goldstein
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x179106D0
Key fingerprint = 7001 5FBF BACE 9E66 3A1C 55E0 161C FF5C 1791 06D0
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-09-15 20:48 ` Doug Goldstein
@ 2004-09-15 22:14 ` Allen Parker
2004-09-15 22:30 ` Stuart Herbert
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Allen Parker @ 2004-09-15 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:48:53 -0400, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I'm actually the maintainer of a couple of Apache modules (currently not
> included in Portage but shortly I'll look to include them when I
> stablize them a bit more) that I have the codebase support both Apache 1
> and Apache 2 through a mess of #DEFINE and ./configure but I did that to
> make it easier for users. With this scheme the package would have to
> appear in two catagories under the same name and it would conflict with
> the other one and provide an ugly mess. Heck.... every package... like
> emerge mod_perl wouldn't even work.. it'd give you an ugly message
> saying which one? www-apache1/mod-perl or www-apache2/mod-perl... Not
> ideal in my book. There's got to be a better way about this.
Don't mean to nitpick, but mod_perl is actually dev-perl/mod_perl and
unless you're going KEYWORDS="~arch", isn't happy with apache2 ;-) on
a standard x86 box (if you're on amd64 or alpha, it's not masked)
either way, if you're brave you've got a choice:
[root$box]::mod_perl> emerge -upv mod_perl
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild N ] dev-perl/libnet-1.16 68 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-perl/Crypt-SSLeay-0.49 114 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-perl/libwww-perl-5.79 +ssl 219 kB
[ebuild N ] sys-libs/db-4.0.14-r3 +doc -java -tcltk 2,638 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/mm-1.2.1 211 kB
[ebuild N ] net-www/apache-1.3.31-r3 +pam 3,146 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-perl/mod_perl-1.27-r4 +ipv6 363 kB
Total size of downloads: 6,762 kB
Now that that's out of the way...
DEPEND=" apache? ( www-apache1/apache )
apache2? ( www-apache2/apache )"
farther on down the ebuild:
if use apache; then
einfo "Building for Apache v1.x"
myconf="${myconf} --build-for-apache1"
fi
I hope you get the point. This isn't as much of a disaster as you're
thinking it is. If you don't need to be put in either catagory,
perhaps a 3rd that is a little more generic for things that don't fit
anywhere else? apache-common?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-09-15 20:48 ` Doug Goldstein
2004-09-15 22:14 ` Allen Parker
@ 2004-09-15 22:30 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-16 0:02 ` Jason Rhinelander
2004-09-16 8:02 ` Paul de Vrieze
1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Stuart Herbert @ 2004-09-15 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1841 bytes --]
Hi Doug,
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 21:48, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> I'm actually the maintainer of a couple of Apache modules (currently not
> included in Portage but shortly I'll look to include them when I
> stablize them a bit more) that I have the codebase support both Apache 1
> and Apache 2 through a mess of #DEFINE and ./configure but I did that to
> make it easier for users.
Please make sure you add yourself to the apache herd when you commit these
modules, and that you list yourself as primary maintainer in the
metadata.xml.
> With this scheme the package would have to
> appear in two catagories under the same name and it would conflict with
> the other one and provide an ugly mess.
Yes, the package would have to appear in two categories. The common parts of
the ebuild can be moved into an eclass. I'm not sure what conflict you think
will arise. All mods that support both apache1 and apache2 should install
into SLOT=1 for apache1 and SLOT=2 for apache2.
> Heck.... every package... like
> emerge mod_perl wouldn't even work.. it'd give you an ugly message
> saying which one? www-apache1/mod-perl or www-apache2/mod-perl... Not
> ideal in my book. There's got to be a better way about this.
You'd only get that message if you typed 'emerge mod_perl'. If you typed
'emerge www-apache1/mod_perl', then you wouldn't get the message.
As I say, I'm open to suggestions.
Best regards,
Stu
--
Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
--
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-09-15 22:30 ` Stuart Herbert
@ 2004-09-16 0:02 ` Jason Rhinelander
2004-09-16 0:09 ` Michael Tindal
2004-09-16 8:02 ` Paul de Vrieze
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jason Rhinelander @ 2004-09-16 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Stuart Herbert wrote:
>>Heck.... every package... like
>>emerge mod_perl wouldn't even work.. it'd give you an ugly message
>>saying which one? www-apache1/mod-perl or www-apache2/mod-perl... Not
>>ideal in my book. There's got to be a better way about this.
>
>
> You'd only get that message if you typed 'emerge mod_perl'. If you typed
> 'emerge www-apache1/mod_perl', then you wouldn't get the message.
True, but how many people "emerge cat/package" vs. just "emerge package"?
-- Jason Rhinelander
-- Gossamer Threads, Inc.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-09-16 0:02 ` Jason Rhinelander
@ 2004-09-16 0:09 ` Michael Tindal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michael Tindal @ 2004-09-16 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 750 bytes --]
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 17:02 -0700, Jason Rhinelander wrote:
> Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > You'd only get that message if you typed 'emerge mod_perl'. If you typed
> > 'emerge www-apache1/mod_perl', then you wouldn't get the message.
>
> True, but how many people "emerge cat/package" vs. just "emerge package"?
Going off of the mod_perl example, if a user types "emerge mod_perl",
portage tells them its ambiguous, then they have to retype "emerge www-
apache1/mod_perl", thats more time they have to spend to install the
package. The more productivity we can give the better, we shouldn't
take the easy route out just because it saves us some work. Personally
I'm in favor of something like apache/apache2 USE flags.
Mike Tindal
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-09-15 22:30 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-16 0:02 ` Jason Rhinelander
@ 2004-09-16 8:02 ` Paul de Vrieze
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Paul de Vrieze @ 2004-09-16 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1071 bytes --]
On Thursday 16 September 2004 00:30, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Yes, the package would have to appear in two categories. The common
> parts of the ebuild can be moved into an eclass. I'm not sure what
> conflict you think will arise. All mods that support both apache1 and
> apache2 should install into SLOT=1 for apache1 and SLOT=2 for apache2.
I have to agree with Doug, it is not clean at all. I really would like to
see some better solution than this cludge.
>
> > Heck.... every package... like
> > emerge mod_perl wouldn't even work.. it'd give you an ugly message
> > saying which one? www-apache1/mod-perl or www-apache2/mod-perl... Not
> > ideal in my book. There's got to be a better way about this.
>
> You'd only get that message if you typed 'emerge mod_perl'. If you
> typed 'emerge www-apache1/mod_perl', then you wouldn't get the message.
>
> As I say, I'm open to suggestions.
Here indeed is a limitation in portage.
Paul
--
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
2004-09-15 20:10 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-09-15 20:22 ` Stuart Herbert
@ 2004-09-16 10:43 ` Michiel de Bruijne
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michiel de Bruijne @ 2004-09-16 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 22:10, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 12:48, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > I'll shortly be starting work on moving apache-related packages.
> >
> > To make life easier for everyone - at the expense of a one-off bit of
> > pain - I'm thinking of splitting the apache packages into TWO categories:
> >
> > - www-apache1 for apache1 packages
> > - www-apache2 for apache2 packages
> >
> > This will be a giant leap towards getting rid of the apache USE flag
> > pain, and the associated noise / bugs that result from this.
>
> If there's a way to get portage to work better without this kind of
> splitting, I'd much rather see that happen. Perhaps SLOTting by what
> it's built for (apache-1/2)? I'm not real clear on the current
> situation.
>
> Splitting in this way really goes against the whole idea of portage
> allowing us to integrate versioned packages into one using a combination
> of USE flags, SLOTs and other tools.
As far as I know it started with kernelheaders, but now more and more packages
(want to) include a versionnummer in the name or give the package an other
name (e.g. gentoo-sources v.s. gentoo-dev-sources). I think this can be
solved by adding the possibillity to portage to check for required SLOT (and
USE) in the (R)DEPEND-function. Do you think this is the right approach?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-16 10:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-19 13:06 [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired Stuart Herbert
2004-07-19 13:32 ` Georgi Georgiev
2004-07-19 20:49 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-07-19 16:56 ` Sergey Borodich
2004-07-19 20:53 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-15 19:48 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-15 20:10 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-09-15 20:22 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-15 20:48 ` Doug Goldstein
2004-09-15 22:14 ` Allen Parker
2004-09-15 22:30 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-16 0:02 ` Jason Rhinelander
2004-09-16 0:09 ` Michael Tindal
2004-09-16 8:02 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-16 10:43 ` Michiel de Bruijne
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox