From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28598 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 11:06:06 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 11:06:06 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C7u5R-00057h-H4 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:06:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 29988 invoked by uid 89); 16 Sep 2004 11:06:00 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 32683 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 11:06:00 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 07:05:59 -0400 From: Jason Cooper To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040916110559.GQ7924@lakedaemon.net> References: <20040916104802.GP7924@lakedaemon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040916104802.GP7924@lakedaemon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-032 script disabling X-Archives-Salt: 82397e95-f01e-4e40-b46a-df8d6e5c8d09 X-Archives-Hash: fa008e5ca4e36058532bfc950d7bc9c8 Jason Cooper (gentoo@lakedaemon.net) scribbled: > Will a future version allow toggling the use of the scripts in that > directory? Is there a reason why an average user needs those to run, > especially in light of things working fine before (well, at least for me > :) )? damn. I started going through the code (delusions of patch-writing danced in my head) and saw "PROGRAM=", then I found it in /etc/udev/rules.d/50... Sorry for the noise. Just a thought, perhaps the scripts directory could be under rules.d? That way it is not confused with something handled in udev.conf. Cooper. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list