From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:02:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200409161002.26330.pauldv@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409152330.20092.stuart@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1071 bytes --]
On Thursday 16 September 2004 00:30, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Yes, the package would have to appear in two categories. The common
> parts of the ebuild can be moved into an eclass. I'm not sure what
> conflict you think will arise. All mods that support both apache1 and
> apache2 should install into SLOT=1 for apache1 and SLOT=2 for apache2.
I have to agree with Doug, it is not clean at all. I really would like to
see some better solution than this cludge.
>
> > Heck.... every package... like
> > emerge mod_perl wouldn't even work.. it'd give you an ugly message
> > saying which one? www-apache1/mod-perl or www-apache2/mod-perl... Not
> > ideal in my book. There's got to be a better way about this.
>
> You'd only get that message if you typed 'emerge mod_perl'. If you
> typed 'emerge www-apache1/mod_perl', then you wouldn't get the message.
>
> As I say, I'm open to suggestions.
Here indeed is a limitation in portage.
Paul
--
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-16 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-19 13:06 [gentoo-dev] net-www Being Retired Stuart Herbert
2004-07-19 13:32 ` Georgi Georgiev
2004-07-19 20:49 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-07-19 16:56 ` Sergey Borodich
2004-07-19 20:53 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-15 19:48 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-15 20:10 ` Donnie Berkholz
2004-09-15 20:22 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-15 20:48 ` Doug Goldstein
2004-09-15 22:14 ` Allen Parker
2004-09-15 22:30 ` Stuart Herbert
2004-09-16 0:02 ` Jason Rhinelander
2004-09-16 0:09 ` Michael Tindal
2004-09-16 8:02 ` Paul de Vrieze [this message]
2004-09-16 10:43 ` Michiel de Bruijne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200409161002.26330.pauldv@gentoo.org \
--to=pauldv@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox