From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11797 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2004 18:05:38 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 15 Sep 2004 18:05:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C7e9x-00029S-VG for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:05:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 9670 invoked by uid 89); 15 Sep 2004 18:05:03 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21341 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2004 18:05:02 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:04:48 -0400 X-OfflineIMAP-1493112007-70696d656e7473656e64-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1095271501-0419006901806-v4.0.6 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040915180448.GF3234@time.flatmonk.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200409151817.49575.jaervosz@gentoo.org> <20040915165346.GE3234@time.flatmonk.org> <200409151905.13066.carlo@gentoo.org> <4148810A.1050706@gentoo.org> <200409151817.49575.jaervosz@gentoo.org> <20040915165346.GE3234@time.flatmonk.org> <200409151905.13066.carlo@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G6nVm6DDWH/FONJq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4148810A.1050706@gentoo.org> <200409151905.13066.carlo@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Heimdal in danger of being security masked X-Archives-Salt: 470e1061-00ce-451e-90a4-ff6e88defef0 X-Archives-Hash: b272aafa7984ccd91887d128d1d744ef --G6nVm6DDWH/FONJq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Carsten Lohrke wrote: [Wed Sep 15 2004, 01:05:05PM EDT] > I guess this a problem of the past. Both packages provide virtual/krb5 an= d=20 > block each other this way. Ah, good. I didn't realize that had been fixed. Thierry Carrez wrote: [Wed Sep 15 2004, 01:51:06PM EDT] > Rule is : if it works at least as well as the current stable > version, then the security-fix version should be marked stable. Sorry, I didn't mean to imply otherwise. The mention of heimdal just brought the bug to mind. Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer --G6nVm6DDWH/FONJq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBSIRAJrHF4yAQTrARAszVAKC/mSCGOSotjNS8NWrjJhSIYtfQNQCgtwfN 1DBHFUEVCzRX9VxBrwtKweM= =ivJN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G6nVm6DDWH/FONJq--