From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-15669-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 24040 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2004 00:08:49 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Sep 2004 00:08:49 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C6HvD-00086x-HH for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 00:08:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 10528 invoked by uid 89); 12 Sep 2004 00:08:26 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 1757 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2004 00:08:25 +0000 From: Alberto Garcia Hierro <tcpdevil@linuxlover.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 02:08:16 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <4143476D.5070207@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4143476D.5070207@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1629453.tbTZrG1OKO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409120208.25977.tcpdevil@linuxlover.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at zeus.linuxlover.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=4.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86 X-Archives-Salt: 2b1b6fbf-38c1-4b34-8d31-a3a5eb0c15ba X-Archives-Hash: 4b688e15727c93a8acec6535fa67024b --nextPart1629453.tbTZrG1OKO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline El S=E1bado, 11 de Septiembre de 2004 20:43, Daniel Goller escribi=F3: > GCC 3.4 should be ready to go ~x86 w/o being profile masked in x86 > profiles anymore. > There are no critical packages that dont compile with it. > If anyone sees a reason to not unmask it, let me know, otherwise we > would like to unamsk it soon. IMHO, GCC 3.4 shouldn't go ~x86 until openoffice.org can be built with it.= =20 Just my 2 cents. Regards, Alberto =2D-=20 /* Alberto Garc=EDa Hierro (Skyhusker) */ --nextPart1629453.tbTZrG1OKO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBQ5N54O6JklHkL2cRAluuAJ0To9ykn3kribaTqsCu9a7XpvRyPgCeKnIM ChKJcEUXge8isoVUtDHS5y8= =q89n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1629453.tbTZrG1OKO--