From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11546 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2004 17:43:13 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Sep 2004 17:43:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C5pQX-0000rQ-FA for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:43:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 27418 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2004 17:42:50 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 31817 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2004 17:42:49 +0000 From: Stuart Herbert Reply-To: stuart@gentoo.org Organization: Gentoo Linux Project To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:42:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200409092212.21995.stuart@gentoo.org> <200409101032.55324.pauldv@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200409101032.55324.pauldv@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2319303.K0yI0XI31O"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409101842.48372.stuart@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Experiment: confcache patch for portage-2.0.50-r10 X-Archives-Salt: c38cf8d1-6a61-45c1-9dea-035c6a8714c9 X-Archives-Hash: 46ef99e0044fbdcb09b42262f583e4aa --nextPart2319303.K0yI0XI31O Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 10 September 2004 09:32, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > One question I have is how cache invalidation is handled? Will the cache > not think until the end of time that e.g. kde is installed > in /usr/kde/3.2 while we allready went on to 4.0? > > Paul My patch uses the sandbox to see which files GNU configure uses. I maintai= n a=20 list of those files, and their checksums. At the start of econf, I check t= he=20 list of checksums. If any of them have changed, I assume the entire cache = is=20 invalid. Best regards, Stu =2D-=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.o= rg Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.or= g/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diar= y/ GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C =2D- --nextPart2319303.K0yI0XI31O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBQeeYDC+AuvmvxXwRAo3SAKCHy9nDCGTe+5s2Nk1rBMxUO3nQWQCeLA/s i2xcO62Ontanx2pBB+UbIV4= =w7HG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2319303.K0yI0XI31O--