From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23831 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2004 02:34:18 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Sep 2004 02:34:18 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C5ElO-0001gQ-58 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:34:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 14880 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2004 02:34:17 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 11383 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2004 02:34:17 +0000 Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 19:26:43 -0700 From: "Robin H. Johnson" In-reply-to: <413FB713.3030404@gentoo.org> To: Gentoo Developers Mail-followup-to: Gentoo Developers Message-id: <20040909022643.GE6455@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts" Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i References: <33333.10.0.0.51.1094638559.squirrel@10.0.0.51> <413FA8B7.8010108@gentoo.org> <413FB713.3030404@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] per package cflags (was Re: Do we want optimal performance?) X-Archives-Salt: 91d69cda-7dd0-43c6-b258-bf1c5b81b5ba X-Archives-Hash: 338db70d625eccc4b8a4ac84ecf3901a --gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:51:15PM -0400, Travis Tilley wrote: > Daniel Goller wrote: > >although i am against overly tweaking CFLAGS, someone suggested=20 > >something that might be more sane to ask for: > > > >/etc/portage/packages.cflags > > > >an easy way to maintain your cflags you worked so hard for to obtain,=20 > >you can trade them in the forums or ebay and then append to your file,= =20 > >not much work to implement in my eyes, and all the testing work is done= =20 > >by those who want it > mkdir /etc/portage and copy this file there (MUCH thanks to solar for=20 > writing this. he like... kicks ass an stuff). it implements an=20 > /etc/portage/package.cflags without needing to patch portage. i think=20 > this might require portage 2.0.51_pre... no idea, i havent used 2.0.50=20 > in a while. [snip] Could this be generalized to do /etc/portage/package.env like somebody else asked for? And then simply put a CFLAGS line in the file referenced by package.env, as it seems that it really would belong there. --=20 Robin Hugh Johnson E-Mail : robbat2@orbis-terrarum.net Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=3Dpeople.robbat2 ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 --gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Robbat2 @ Orbis-Terrarum Networks iD8DBQFBP79jPpIsIjIzwiwRAtEbAKDU49j8UK3n5sRhKSq4vvVxjRCc9ACg4apu Ky7EQR7TWMWHvkA8nSnBrpk= =5TLV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts--