From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>
To: Gentoo Developers <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] per package cflags (was Re: Do we want optimal performance?)
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 19:26:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040909022643.GE6455@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <413FB713.3030404@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1259 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:51:15PM -0400, Travis Tilley wrote:
> Daniel Goller wrote:
> >although i am against overly tweaking CFLAGS, someone suggested
> >something that might be more sane to ask for:
> >
> >/etc/portage/packages.cflags
> >
> >an easy way to maintain your cflags you worked so hard for to obtain,
> >you can trade them in the forums or ebay and then append to your file,
> >not much work to implement in my eyes, and all the testing work is done
> >by those who want it
> mkdir /etc/portage and copy this file there (MUCH thanks to solar for
> writing this. he like... kicks ass an stuff). it implements an
> /etc/portage/package.cflags without needing to patch portage. i think
> this might require portage 2.0.51_pre... no idea, i havent used 2.0.50
> in a while.
[snip]
Could this be generalized to do /etc/portage/package.env like somebody
else asked for?
And then simply put a CFLAGS line in the file referenced by package.env,
as it seems that it really would belong there.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2@orbis-terrarum.net
Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-09 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-08 10:15 [gentoo-dev] Do we want optimal performance? Klavs Klavsen
2004-09-08 11:29 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-08 12:03 ` Corvus Corax
2004-09-08 13:16 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-08 12:19 ` Alin Nastac
2004-09-08 13:24 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2004-09-08 13:43 ` Patrick Lauer
2004-09-08 14:21 ` Klavs Klavsen
2004-09-09 7:52 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-08 12:49 ` Spider
2004-09-08 17:16 ` Robert Moss
2004-09-08 18:20 ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-09-08 19:11 ` Klavs Klavsen
2004-09-08 19:54 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-09-08 20:05 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2004-09-08 19:41 ` Lisa Seelye
2004-09-09 0:49 ` Daniel Goller
2004-09-09 1:51 ` [gentoo-dev] per package cflags (was Re: Do we want optimal performance?) Travis Tilley
2004-09-09 2:26 ` Robin H. Johnson [this message]
2004-09-09 3:42 ` Ned Ludd
2004-09-09 3:49 ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-09-09 17:23 ` Robert Moss
2004-09-09 4:41 ` Will Buckner
2004-09-09 4:51 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-09-09 6:07 ` [gentoo-dev] Do we want optimal performance? Klavs Klavsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040909022643.GE6455@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net \
--to=robbat2@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox