From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19474 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2004 00:55:40 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 4 Sep 2004 00:55:40 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C3OqB-0001uT-Kv for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2004 00:55:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 11804 invoked by uid 89); 4 Sep 2004 00:55:39 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21324 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2004 00:55:38 +0000 From: Luke-Jr To: billk@iinet.net.au, gentoo-dev List Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 00:55:38 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20040903125147.GB6307@gentoo.org> <200409031750.32517.luke-jr@utopios.org> <1094257095.10749.36.camel@rattus.Localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1094257095.10749.36.camel@rattus.Localdomain> IM-Address: luke-jr@jabber.org Public-GPG-Key-URI: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xD53E9583 Public-GPG-Key: 0xD53E9583 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409040055.39154.luke-jr@utopios.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for change of emerge -up output X-Archives-Salt: 912efe4e-2a44-4ba9-9064-a85c106ec630 X-Archives-Hash: d4d2f9927b97cc2ab221d3cc3ef84430 The current plans are to remove 'inject' altogether... Changing it to continue to have the same (or at least similar) effect is better than that. On Saturday 04 September 2004 12:18 am, William Kenworthy wrote: > Can you describe how changing the inject function will improve portage > use - seems a real step backward from a user point of view. For an > example of the problems this type of change causes check out the many > posts on package.keywords - complicated matters for users. As well I > have two systems that work fine, and one that ignores anything in > package.mask! > > Are we going down the path of complicating gentoo and reaping mandrake > like rewards (an overcomplicated, fragile management system for the > distro) by doing so? > > BillK > > On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 01:50, Luke-Jr wrote: > > On Friday 03 September 2004 5:46 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Friday 03 September 2004 10:55 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > > Well, inject should never be used as a matter of course, so I don't > > > > think this is a reasonable objection really... > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- Luke-Jr Developer, Utopios http://utopios.org/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list