From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14708 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 19:27:05 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Sep 2004 19:27:05 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2al6-0005YX-MG for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 19:27:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 752 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2004 19:27:04 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 22746 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 19:27:04 +0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:27:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <52d1aa13e7ad93c6acba03290facc9bb@mudra> <20040901142543.17fcedea@thelair> <200409011535.35368.carlo@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200409011535.35368.carlo@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409012127.01912.pauldv@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman failing (seemingly) incorrectly X-Archives-Salt: 86eba1d7-9292-4846-a57c-772139dee009 X-Archives-Hash: fae6d9174ee2635569a69ea12c1da2db On Wednesday 01 September 2004 15:35, Carsten Lohrke wrote: > On Wednesday 01 September 2004 14:25, Andrej Kacian wrote: > > Um, aren't devs supposed to run portage.51 ? > > I think, there are enough devs, who test it. No need to grill my box. ;) The most recent releases behave quite well and the bugs have mainly gone out. (Except some erronous error messages) Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list