From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31904 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 18:02:06 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Sep 2004 18:02:06 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2ZQr-0004mu-RK for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 18:02:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 20557 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2004 18:02:05 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 5877 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 18:02:04 +0000 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 08:59:11 -0700 From: "Robin H. Johnson" In-reply-to: <20040901140246.GA5942@CogES> To: Gentoo Developers Mail-followup-to: Gentoo Developers Message-id: <20040901155911.GB20759@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-disposition: inline References: <4134FB0B.9060501@ifm.liu.se> <20040901140246.GA5942@CogES> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] per-package environment variables. X-Archives-Salt: fa009bf2-e9be-4c84-83a6-43b30497465e X-Archives-Hash: d4673aa18270cf1165ab1c6bd07f520e --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 04:02:46PM +0200, aye wrote: > well - i've got one more idea. all your proposal have one weakness from > my point of view. i've reported bug (and reopened the second one) for > one reason: i want to have some base system compiled in way, which makes > me possibility to run on diffrent procesors (mainly i'm interested in > pentiums and athlons), while the rest of programs should be compiled > with optimalization for my home cpu. > in your solutions i'd have to had a long file looks like it: [snip] Your setup here could be better solved with portage recognizing groups of packages - both predefined groups 'system' and custom groups. Eg you can replace everything with one line: package-group/system low_c_flags And that would compile everything portage considers as system with the environment from low_c_flags. --=20 Robin Hugh Johnson E-Mail : robbat2@orbis-terrarum.net Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=3Dpeople.robbat2 ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Robbat2 @ Orbis-Terrarum Networks iD8DBQFBNfHPPpIsIjIzwiwRAjAeAJ9nNHa28hWLVuSqPC/vAIhkP3TvqACgwWo4 ksWtkYFCsmqP3xQ2eP06dlE= =nNMj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN--