From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24523 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 00:01:09 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Sep 2004 00:01:09 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2IYn-0001Yf-3t for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:01:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 25360 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2004 00:01:08 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 14844 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 00:01:08 +0000 From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:03:55 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <52d1aa13e7ad93c6acba03290facc9bb@mudra> <200409010007.55043.carlo@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200409010007.55043.carlo@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409010903.55084.jstubbs@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman failing (seemingly) incorrectly X-Archives-Salt: 745a5fc6-5ad0-4df0-ab6e-042ebc758aca X-Archives-Hash: a6ebf6ee6af1c494efad4e7b2667315b On Wednesday 01 September 2004 07:07, Carsten Lohrke wrote: > On Tuesday 31 August 2004 23:40, Armando Di Cianno wrote: > > ... if anyone has a moment, _please_ read over that page, and smack me > > over the head (if need be) to point out what's wrong, or let me know > > if you're stumped to. > > Appreciated this "feature", too - repoman/portage.50 sux. :) Ermm...? Regards, Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list