From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25068 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2004 23:16:14 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 31 Aug 2004 23:16:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2HrK-0001rX-5k for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:16:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 3732 invoked by uid 89); 31 Aug 2004 23:16:08 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 13670 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2004 23:16:08 +0000 From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 08:18:55 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <52d1aa13e7ad93c6acba03290facc9bb@mudra> In-Reply-To: <52d1aa13e7ad93c6acba03290facc9bb@mudra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409010818.55466.jstubbs@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman failing (seemingly) incorrectly X-Archives-Salt: 0ec5b605-4a51-43b6-9701-a7841ea7327a X-Archives-Hash: 369129e660f331118ea1876bbfba8dda On Wednesday 01 September 2004 06:40, Armando Di Cianno wrote: > Before I file a bug on repoman, I thought I'd toss this out there, and > see what everyone thinks. This problem I'm having is just about to > drive me crazy, and, since I'd rather not ignore repoman, I'm not sure > what to do. > > My problem is chronicled here: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~fafhrd/whydoesrepomanhateme.html > Currently, in cvs, I've committed "virtual/gnustep-back > gnustep-base/gnustep-back-xlib" to .../profiles/base/virtuals (atm, > whereever GNUstep builds requires x11) and "virtual/gnustep-back > gnustep-base/gnustep-back-art" to .../profiles/default-linux/virtuals (not > committed yet) as that backend looks a lot better where it's possibly > supported. There exist other backends, but they are in heavier development, > and I do not plan on supporting them, atm. Check gentoo-x86/profiles/profiles.desc for a list of the profiles that repoman uses for each architecture. Regards, Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list