From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32245 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2004 00:00:48 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Aug 2004 00:00:48 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C1D7o-0001Cc-AT for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 00:00:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 12617 invoked by uid 89); 29 Aug 2004 00:00:22 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 10898 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2004 00:00:21 +0000 Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 02:00:20 +0200 From: Karl Trygve Kalleberg To: Jonathan Fors Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040829000020.GL19846@gentoo.org> References: <412DF540.3000201@myrealbox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="juZjCTNxrMaZdGZC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <412DF540.3000201@myrealbox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Karl Trygve Kalleberg Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] CVS or normal package? X-Archives-Salt: a42697ef-45cd-4754-bbb6-1b9a86ffb758 X-Archives-Hash: 2ca82c437fbb5aa022add3f30541da21 --juZjCTNxrMaZdGZC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 04:35:44PM +0200, Jonathan Fors wrote: > Hello > I have begun hacking on the glsa-check script today, and I came up with= =20 > serious improvements and hacks that seem useful. > However, before I send a patch, should I base my work on the source=20 > distfile or the CVS? The version of gentoolkit that I have currently=20 > improved upon is gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre8. > Sorry if this question may seem ignorant, but this is the first time I=20 > am ever contributing to a project. For the maintainer, it's easiest if you supply a patch against CVS, since t= hat results in the least amount of hassle when applying the patch. Sometimes you have to take into account CVS branching, but we don't do that for gentoolkit, so there's not a problem there. -- Karl T --juZjCTNxrMaZdGZC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBMRyUkvv4V9zefggRAhaRAKCL5Oh1KQEEyHCQ0NIv2biQF1df7QCg4j53 rr2b+WiL89CylBsSNmVIw5I= =EiKE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --juZjCTNxrMaZdGZC--