From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6839 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2004 23:24:57 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Aug 2004 23:24:57 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C0Tc1-0006zf-7W for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:24:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 20085 invoked by uid 89); 26 Aug 2004 23:24:56 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 3271 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2004 23:24:56 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:21:52 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040827002152.7082da3b@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200408261922.30330.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20040826173433.14703c11@snowdrop.home> <200408261922.30330.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__27_Aug_2004_00_21_52_+0100_y_U6infNCpLV+ib." Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper KEYWORD(-order)ing X-Archives-Salt: 236606c3-9081-4901-93a1-2bdf0eb2e92f X-Archives-Hash: 8f61a24e5d14637cac1a5379d2800ff7 --Signature=_Fri__27_Aug_2004_00_21_52_+0100_y_U6infNCpLV+ib. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 19:22:24 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: | so we've never had a policy on this and i know a lot of you may think | it's a stupid thing to nitpick over (but dont worry, ive got a lot | more like this), but can we agree from now on to order KEYWORDS in | alphabetical order ? Uh, we *do* have a policy on this... KEYWORDS are in in the order in which they are added. If you use ekeyword, it will handle this for you. Note that, as usual, said policy is probably only documented in an email thread from about a year ago.. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature=_Fri__27_Aug_2004_00_21_52_+0100_y_U6infNCpLV+ib. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBLnCW96zL6DUtXhERAvD1AJ9RT8e7Ys5y6L2ytD8ZIT/gcHFGhgCgximf QKh0PoZuKQuenH0cGoODQ9w= =j7Ul -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__27_Aug_2004_00_21_52_+0100_y_U6infNCpLV+ib.--