From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 824 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 18:57:59 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Aug 2004 18:58:00 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C02y4-0000As-Db for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:57:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 8965 invoked by uid 89); 25 Aug 2004 18:57:55 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 9405 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 18:57:55 +0000 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:57:49 +0200 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040825205749.66febfd4@andy.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <1093459671.31841.71.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> References: <412CD487.5040705@gentoo.org> <20040825182258.GC30125@kroah.com> <1093459671.31841.71.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Organization: Gentoo Linux X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: H@&[wkk?l:Zx:8i_5bViK&{Vz{c{~r),^&:v/r#+X5dmfA6qCl)~'Ul{"&06Q1[05.%v&c>je5R{=xLnx^=~lN~rO0xuR~~NY)CX\"Nc4$9CBPwDl-.pYuVeGdir86L@\:j?7@%Ej2?Wi-Y0=1]T14ce0w79Bckk[*ti{;iA"{;I}&E~.msRBsBS)N!CS4Gd|_UR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__25_Aug_2004_20_57_50_+0200_4rZPgPJTpS_TYTdD" X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:7e6c91d1b14dbccceb2f2166522fa0f6 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] devleopment sources are no longer 'development' - example X-Archives-Salt: c8d19b00-fc33-43b2-abc5-a26fbe72b7f1 X-Archives-Hash: f82f12ab9d2b63483138b80a1e2971ef --Signature=_Wed__25_Aug_2004_20_57_50_+0200_4rZPgPJTpS_TYTdD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/25/04 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 14:22, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 02:03:51PM -0400, Travis Tilley wrote: > > > here's an example of how his creates confusion, where on amd64 our > > > > > > stable kernel is named development-sources. > > > > I agree it's a pain. Hopefully this can be fixed someday soon with > > slots. > > Is there any way to restrict by slot? To say, keep an ebuild with a > SLOT >= x from installing? Not directly, but as long as the SLOT is derived from PV there shouldn't be much of a difference from simply package.mask'ing it. The current SLOT implementation generally is only good for keeping old versions around. Marius --Signature=_Wed__25_Aug_2004_20_57_50_+0200_4rZPgPJTpS_TYTdD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBLOExWzrL1pM7SNcRAtoNAJ9pcBOWr0dSUFbrG/3aqUeLiPvNugCfTYMn /05ADgOPfAtYInOdd/HlGUQ= =TEDr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__25_Aug_2004_20_57_50_+0200_4rZPgPJTpS_TYTdD--