From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7202 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 19:44:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Aug 2004 19:44:31 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C03h9-00042v-7a for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:44:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 576 invoked by uid 89); 25 Aug 2004 19:43:40 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 203 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 19:43:40 +0000 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:40:20 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Ioannis Aslanidis Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040825194020.GA9706@kroah.com> Reply-To: gentoo-dev References: <412CD487.5040705@gentoo.org> <20040825182258.GC30125@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] devleopment sources are no longer 'development' - example X-Archives-Salt: 5b107f37-e30c-4e5f-a847-bdd00187d89b X-Archives-Hash: 2d22546cd07f5675ff478d89e17a053b On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 08:34:06PM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: > Let me suggest the following: > > rename all kernels to have their version concatenated, that is: > > gentoo-sources24 > gentoo-sources26 > > Instead of having no numbering, do the opposite, have them all > numbered. This way there will be no more problems with kernel > versioning again. I don't have a problem with this, but the dependancy stuff might not work out properly for some odd kernel-based userspace packages. Anyone object to this? thanks, greg k-h -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list