From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22693 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 18:23:45 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Aug 2004 18:23:45 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C02Qz-0002Ux-B3 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:23:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 14896 invoked by uid 89); 25 Aug 2004 18:23:44 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 7216 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 18:23:44 +0000 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:22:58 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Travis Tilley Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040825182258.GC30125@kroah.com> References: <412CD487.5040705@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <412CD487.5040705@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] devleopment sources are no longer 'development' - example X-Archives-Salt: 43194322-9f76-44b7-b6d9-2a501837de15 X-Archives-Hash: f080b8bed7d0f05947541cb761f401b5 On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 02:03:51PM -0400, Travis Tilley wrote: > here's an example of how his creates confusion, where on amd64 our > stable kernel is named development-sources. I agree it's a pain. Hopefully this can be fixed someday soon with slots. thanks, greg k-h -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list