From: Peter Cech <cech@upc.uniba.sk>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming repoman check will fail on large files in the tree
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:08:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040825130836.GC10036@pec.upc.uniba.sk> (raw)
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 07:56:35AM +0100, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 04:52:40AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Policy states files over 20k are not to be commited- I'll be committing
> > the logic to enforce this shortly- files over 20k will be viewed by
> > repoman as a failed check.
> >
>
> Sorry for the late reply, but does this really need to be checked by
> repoman, shouldnt this kind of decision be left to the developers
> discretion?
As a Gentoo user I welcome the restriction. It seems that developers
discretion was failing in some cases.
Personally I feel strongly against files subdirs in portage tree. Just
look at this statistics for files subdirs:
7503 files subdirectories contain:
22720 files (of that 7085 are files other than digest-*) of size
16837645 bytes (15452582 when not counting digests)
None of the files is needed prior to emerge -f. Most of them are never
used, but have to be transfered on emerge sync and have to be on the
harddrive. IMO this part of portage tree should be moved out and
downloaded with sources on fetch step.
Regards,
Peter Cech
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2004-08-25 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-25 13:08 Peter Cech [this message]
2004-08-25 15:31 ` [gentoo-dev] Upcoming repoman check will fail on large files in the tree Andrew Cooks
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-29 9:52 Brian Harring
2004-07-29 14:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-07-29 19:53 ` Jason Rhinelander
2004-07-30 3:15 ` Georgi Georgiev
2004-07-30 3:20 ` Brian Harring
2004-07-30 3:22 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-30 4:07 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-07-30 7:00 ` Robin H. Johnson
2004-07-30 7:43 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-08-25 6:56 ` Tavis Ormandy
2004-08-25 14:40 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-08-25 17:19 ` Robert Moss
2004-08-26 14:34 ` Eldad Zack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040825130836.GC10036@pec.upc.uniba.sk \
--to=cech@upc.uniba.sk \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox