From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20315 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 14:40:56 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Aug 2004 14:40:56 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BzyxL-0001EJ-KD for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:40:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 6687 invoked by uid 89); 25 Aug 2004 14:40:55 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 25192 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 14:40:52 +0000 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:40:45 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <1091094759.6176.23.camel@6-allhosts> <20040825065635.GA21244@sdf.lonestar.org> In-Reply-To: <20040825065635.GA21244@sdf.lonestar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200408251040.45561.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming repoman check will fail on large files in the tree X-Archives-Salt: 0155228f-162b-478f-a2a8-2c47ba86c9f0 X-Archives-Hash: 979b3f6f3d62e009759e422395a2b402 On Wednesday 25 August 2004 02:56 am, Tavis Ormandy wrote: > Sorry for the late reply, but does this really need to be checked by > repoman, shouldnt this kind of decision be left to the developers > discretion? it should be but since it's obvious that policy is ignored (either because the dev doesnt notice or they just dont care), we need something to help enforce -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list