From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-15178-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 15045 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2004 05:38:18 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197)
by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Aug 2004 05:38:18 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org)
by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1BzU0g-0001ns-HY
for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 05:38:18 +0000
Received: (qmail 4968 invoked by uid 89); 24 Aug 2004 05:38:18 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 13317 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2004 05:38:17 +0000
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 07:38:13 +0200
From: Marius Mauch <genone@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Message-Id: <20040824073813.3d1915b9@andy.genone.homeip.net>
In-Reply-To: <200408232331.07483.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <412A9AFD.2030609@gentoo.org>
<412AAB54.2090702@ramshacklestudios.com>
<200408232331.07483.vapier@gentoo.org>
Organization: Gentoo Linux
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
X-Face: H@&[wkk?l:Zx:8i_5bViK&{Vz{c{~r),^&:v/r#+X5dmfA6qCl)~'Ul{"&06Q1[05.%v&c>je5R{=xLnx^=~lN~rO0xuR~~NY)<MB_iH0+TEA(imBf+vcJfeG1sjv=IfQCn8OB5IGuRjP8?8=;ptUrg\oGjgDx;=$ToLyG!Qz]g?"{zwH`>CX\"Nc4$9CBPwDl-.pYuVeGdir86L@\:j?7@%Ej2?Wi-Y0=1]T14ce0w79Bckk[*ti{;iA"{;I}&E~.msRBsBS)N!CS4Gd|_UR
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg="pgp-sha1";
boundary="Signature=_Tue__24_Aug_2004_07_38_13_+0200_MTXuozNeBr1xTCzG"
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:7e6c91d1b14dbccceb2f2166522fa0f6
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] development-sources are not 'development'
X-Archives-Salt: adf813ed-539f-4a6d-83fc-5c79e59081e4
X-Archives-Hash: 7b777b9a5d7ca383486869b9d0a0d208
--Signature=_Tue__24_Aug_2004_07_38_13_+0200_MTXuozNeBr1xTCzG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 08/23/04 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 23 August 2004 10:43 pm, Peter Gordon wrote:
> > Couldn't we just use different ebuild versions?
> >
> > # emerge ">=gentoo-sources-2.6"
> > # emerge "=gentoo-sources-2.4.27"
> >
> > Or something similar? Would that work?
>
> it should be that way i think but currently (i believe, someone please
> prove me wrong) if you have 'gentoo-sources-2.4.27' and 'gentoo-2.6',
> portage will automatically try to 'upgrade' you to 2.6 from 2.4.27
> even if we SLOT them differently
Well, kernels already have SLOT=$KV.
Marius
--Signature=_Tue__24_Aug_2004_07_38_13_+0200_MTXuozNeBr1xTCzG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBKtRJWzrL1pM7SNcRAo5aAJ9QMfT96DcXMvVEZUb4KYo9DP6kRACghou0
IZFU+zQ5TYsLq4dDXijXm9I=
=jN5U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature=_Tue__24_Aug_2004_07_38_13_+0200_MTXuozNeBr1xTCzG--